Résultats de la mesure du délai de révision des TAF |
Scénariot:
NC_CRITERIA Mois: Janvier Année: 2017 Cible: ≥ 90% |
Centre de météorologie aeronautique canadien/est (Montréal) |
Station |
Nombre de
situations observées non couvertes par un TAF en vigueur |
Nombre de
cas suivis d'un TAF révisé |
Nombre de
cas avec réponse dans le TAF normal suivant |
Nombre de
cas où la situation observée est revenue aux conditions prévus |
Nombre de
cas où les observation et le TAF sont restés en désaccord |
Délai de
révision moyen (minutes) |
Pourcentage
de cas suivis d'une révision dans les 20 minutes |
Nombre de
révisions proactives |
Attawapiskat |
20 |
10 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
11 |
89% |
7 |
Baie
Comeau |
65 |
38 |
2 |
25 |
0 |
13 |
80% |
21 |
Bathurst |
25 |
19 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
16 |
83% |
14 |
Big
Trout Lake |
52 |
21 |
9 |
22 |
0 |
10 |
94% |
15 |
Blanc
Sablon |
38 |
33 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
15 |
71% |
19 |
Buttonville |
50 |
32 |
7 |
11 |
0 |
18 |
70% |
23 |
Cartwright |
26 |
23 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
20 |
77% |
11 |
Chapleau |
27 |
21 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
17 |
67% |
14 |
Charlottetown |
43 |
34 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
14 |
79% |
23 |
Chibougamau-Chapais |
43 |
19 |
2 |
20 |
2 |
13 |
80% |
14 |
Churchill
Falls |
47 |
21 |
3 |
22 |
1 |
17 |
78% |
18 |
Deer
Lake |
38 |
31 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
19 |
79% |
15 |
Dorval |
31 |
22 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
16 |
68% |
27 |
Dryden |
72 |
32 |
3 |
36 |
1 |
16 |
80% |
21 |
Earlton |
21 |
16 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
13 |
90% |
5 |
Fort
Severn |
17 |
12 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
11 |
93% |
7 |
Fredericton |
62 |
40 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
12 |
89% |
24 |
Gander |
68 |
54 |
2 |
12 |
0 |
16 |
76% |
15 |
Gaspé |
28 |
23 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
78% |
16 |
Gatineau |
23 |
14 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
24 |
50% |
8 |
Geraldton |
37 |
26 |
3 |
8 |
0 |
18 |
73% |
23 |
Gore Bay |
26 |
19 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
11 |
96% |
11 |
Halifax |
38 |
30 |
6 |
2 |
0 |
13 |
87% |
24 |
Hamilton |
53 |
41 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
16 |
75% |
25 |
Havre St
Pierre |
77 |
35 |
4 |
38 |
0 |
12 |
90% |
26 |
Îles de
la Madeleine |
25 |
21 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
83% |
21 |
Inukjuak |
76 |
32 |
3 |
41 |
0 |
15 |
83% |
18 |
Ivujivik |
9 |
6 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
30 |
38% |
4 |
Kapuskasing |
52 |
46 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
19 |
75% |
17 |
Kenora |
33 |
30 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
22 |
75% |
21 |
Kingston |
26 |
23 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
92% |
9 |
Kuujjuaq |
39 |
30 |
1 |
6 |
2 |
14 |
81% |
16 |
Kuujjuarapik |
48 |
23 |
3 |
20 |
2 |
22 |
70% |
23 |
La
Grande IV |
45 |
14 |
2 |
27 |
2 |
8 |
98% |
7 |
La
Grande Rivière |
72 |
59 |
4 |
8 |
1 |
18 |
82% |
32 |
London |
59 |
38 |
3 |
17 |
1 |
16 |
76% |
35 |
Marathon |
17 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
23 |
73% |
8 |
Mary's
Harbour |
51 |
23 |
2 |
24 |
2 |
14 |
84% |
6 |
Mirabel |
51 |
42 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
18 |
75% |
32 |
Moncton |
47 |
36 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
11 |
94% |
20 |
Mont-Joli |
41 |
34 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
17 |
80% |
24 |
Moosonee |
34 |
17 |
1 |
15 |
1 |
12 |
91% |
16 |
Muskoka |
41 |
19 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
15 |
80% |
21 |
Muskrat
Dam |
24 |
9 |
0 |
14 |
1 |
11 |
91% |
7 |
Nain |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
86% |
5 |
Natashquan |
55 |
30 |
4 |
21 |
0 |
11 |
87% |
32 |
North
Bay |
73 |
53 |
0 |
20 |
0 |
14 |
86% |
13 |
Ottawa |
50 |
39 |
4 |
7 |
0 |
13 |
78% |
15 |
Peterborough |
56 |
25 |
3 |
23 |
5 |
24 |
67% |
17 |
Pickle
Lake |
24 |
17 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
22 |
81% |
8 |
Puvirnituq |
45 |
19 |
5 |
20 |
1 |
19 |
75% |
19 |
Quaqtaq |
5 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
100% |
14 |
Quebec
City |
53 |
44 |
3 |
6 |
0 |
21 |
75% |
9 |
Red Lake |
21 |
15 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
83% |
13 |
Roberval |
28 |
23 |
0 |
5 |
0 |
13 |
75% |
11 |
Sable
Island |
28 |
12 |
1 |
14 |
1 |
14 |
81% |
11 |
Saint
John |
38 |
37 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
82% |
27 |
Sandy
Lake |
35 |
17 |
0 |
18 |
0 |
11 |
83% |
18 |
Sarnia |
30 |
15 |
0 |
8 |
7 |
19 |
74% |
20 |
Sault
Ste Marie |
59 |
47 |
5 |
7 |
0 |
11 |
93% |
21 |
Schefferville |
71 |
35 |
4 |
30 |
2 |
15 |
84% |
24 |
Sept-Îles |
41 |
30 |
1 |
10 |
0 |
12 |
90% |
18 |
Sherbrooke |
38 |
18 |
1 |
17 |
2 |
15 |
78% |
17 |
Sioux
Lookout |
38 |
28 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
20 |
68% |
27 |
St
Anthony |
82 |
39 |
6 |
35 |
2 |
15 |
80% |
41 |
St
Catharines |
17 |
15 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
15 |
88% |
7 |
St
Hubert |
106 |
45 |
3 |
58 |
0 |
19 |
70% |
29 |
St
John's |
62 |
48 |
8 |
5 |
1 |
16 |
77% |
33 |
Stephenville |
47 |
33 |
4 |
9 |
1 |
21 |
70% |
28 |
Sudbury |
56 |
51 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
11 |
96% |
19 |
Sydney |
49 |
30 |
4 |
14 |
1 |
21 |
65% |
17 |
Tasiujaq |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
100% |
4 |
Thunder
Bay |
32 |
24 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
16 |
73% |
17 |
Timmins |
40 |
34 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
82% |
15 |
Toronto
City Centre |
41 |
26 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
15 |
80% |
21 |
Toronto
LBPI |
30 |
22 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
16 |
87% |
24 |
Trois
rivieres |
84 |
43 |
4 |
37 |
0 |
16 |
80% |
9 |
Val-d'Or |
68 |
43 |
4 |
21 |
0 |
16 |
81% |
24 |
Wabush |
37 |
26 |
2 |
9 |
0 |
16 |
68% |
11 |
Waskaganish |
3 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
100% |
3 |
Waterloo/Wellington |
56 |
30 |
3 |
20 |
3 |
17 |
79% |
19 |
Wawa |
20 |
15 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
18 |
79% |
12 |
Wiarton |
18 |
14 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
20 |
65% |
22 |
Windsor |
58 |
41 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
20 |
61% |
28 |
Yarmouth |
40 |
35 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
14 |
85% |
21 |
|
Centre de
météorologie aeronautique canadien/ouest (Edmonton) |
Station |
Nombre de
situations observées non couvertes par un TAF en vigueur |
Nombre de
cas suivis d'un TAF révisé |
Nombre de
cas avec réponse dans le TAF normal suivant |
Nombre de
cas où la situation observée est revenue aux conditions prévus |
Nombre de
cas où les observation et le TAF sont restés en désaccord |
Délai de
révision moyen (minutes) |
Pourcentage
de cas suivis d'une révision dans les 20 minutes |
Nombre de
révisions proactives |
Abbotsford |
10 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
100% |
11 |
Arctic
Bay |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
47 |
0% |
5 |
Arviat |
66 |
36 |
6 |
23 |
1 |
19 |
72% |
17 |
Baker
Lake |
28 |
25 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
15 |
86% |
16 |
Bella
Bella |
17 |
8 |
1 |
8 |
0 |
11 |
82% |
5 |
Brandon |
14 |
13 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
100% |
12 |
Buffalo
Narrows |
11 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
15 |
90% |
5 |
Burwash |
26 |
18 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
21 |
64% |
16 |
Calgary
Intl |
33 |
22 |
3 |
7 |
1 |
13 |
94% |
13 |
Cambridge
Bay |
40 |
36 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
95% |
22 |
Campbell
River |
16 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
16 |
81% |
7 |
Cape
Dorset |
47 |
25 |
3 |
17 |
2 |
27 |
60% |
19 |
Castlegar |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
57% |
3 |
Churchill |
36 |
30 |
2 |
4 |
0 |
17 |
78% |
26 |
Clyde
River |
48 |
22 |
4 |
20 |
2 |
18 |
76% |
17 |
Coral
Harbour |
14 |
10 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
20 |
64% |
10 |
Cranbrook |
16 |
16 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
75% |
2 |
Deline |
13 |
9 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
73% |
4 |
Dauphin |
56 |
24 |
4 |
27 |
1 |
13 |
87% |
11 |
Dawson
City |
11 |
9 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
16 |
82% |
1 |
Dawson
Creek |
34 |
20 |
0 |
13 |
1 |
9 |
91% |
12 |
Dease
Lake |
29 |
18 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
14 |
89% |
5 |
Edmonton
Intl |
27 |
20 |
3 |
4 |
0 |
13 |
85% |
21 |
Edmonton
Villeneuve |
54 |
26 |
6 |
20 |
2 |
17 |
77% |
12 |
Estevan |
17 |
14 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
22 |
75% |
5 |
Eureka |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
100% |
9 |
Faro |
7 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
100% |
1 |
Fort
Chipewyan |
30 |
18 |
2 |
10 |
0 |
10 |
93% |
5 |
Fort
Good Hope |
10 |
9 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
14 |
80% |
0 |
Fort
McMurray |
62 |
31 |
5 |
26 |
0 |
11 |
92% |
15 |
Fort
McPherson |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
100% |
3 |
Fort
Nelson |
22 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
16 |
95% |
2 |
Fort
Simpson |
18 |
15 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
15 |
72% |
5 |
Fort
Smith |
38 |
26 |
3 |
7 |
2 |
14 |
83% |
18 |
Fort St
John |
34 |
28 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
17 |
79% |
18 |
Gillam |
28 |
22 |
0 |
6 |
0 |
15 |
75% |
11 |
Gjoa
Haven |
55 |
27 |
2 |
23 |
3 |
25 |
60% |
32 |
Grande
Prairie |
34 |
26 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
18 |
79% |
14 |
Hall
Beach |
67 |
35 |
4 |
24 |
4 |
19 |
75% |
17 |
Hay
River |
27 |
24 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
89% |
17 |
High
Level |
37 |
25 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
17 |
78% |
12 |
Holman |
10 |
6 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
21 |
86% |
7 |
Igloolik |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
75% |
7 |
Inuvik |
32 |
25 |
3 |
3 |
1 |
19 |
71% |
7 |
Iqaluit |
36 |
26 |
3 |
6 |
1 |
18 |
71% |
13 |
Island
Lake |
31 |
22 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
16 |
74% |
14 |
Kamloops |
5 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
21 |
80% |
3 |
Kelowna |
58 |
35 |
1 |
21 |
1 |
19 |
75% |
8 |
Key Lake |
44 |
29 |
2 |
13 |
0 |
10 |
84% |
7 |
Kugaaruk |
8 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
75% |
5 |
Kugluktuk |
42 |
32 |
1 |
8 |
1 |
16 |
80% |
20 |
La Ronge |
11 |
8 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
22 |
73% |
7 |
Lethbridge |
26 |
16 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
16 |
76% |
7 |
Lloydminster |
45 |
29 |
5 |
10 |
1 |
20 |
70% |
7 |
Lutselk'e |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
100% |
13 |
Lynn
Lake |
47 |
24 |
5 |
17 |
1 |
15 |
74% |
12 |
Mackenzie |
42 |
17 |
2 |
22 |
1 |
11 |
93% |
11 |
Masset |
18 |
14 |
0 |
4 |
0 |
16 |
78% |
6 |
Mayo |
15 |
11 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
12 |
86% |
3 |
Medicine
Hat |
18 |
15 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
100% |
9 |
Nanaimo |
15 |
12 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
16 |
87% |
4 |
Norman
Wells |
36 |
30 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
15 |
83% |
6 |
North
Battleford |
41 |
22 |
2 |
16 |
1 |
16 |
75% |
9 |
Norway
House |
47 |
26 |
3 |
18 |
0 |
13 |
83% |
11 |
Old Crow |
9 |
8 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
100% |
7 |
Pangnirtung |
8 |
5 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
15 |
62% |
6 |
Paulatuk |
12 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
11 |
82% |
11 |
Peace
River |
28 |
21 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
15 |
79% |
14 |
Penticton |
19 |
12 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
22 |
56% |
18 |
Pond
Inlet |
32 |
13 |
1 |
17 |
1 |
14 |
77% |
14 |
Port
Hardy |
4 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
75% |
5 |
Prince
Albert |
25 |
16 |
2 |
7 |
0 |
15 |
84% |
9 |
Prince
George |
58 |
36 |
1 |
21 |
0 |
14 |
78% |
23 |
Qikiqtarjuaq |
26 |
13 |
3 |
10 |
0 |
11 |
85% |
13 |
Quesnel |
34 |
11 |
0 |
22 |
1 |
14 |
88% |
17 |
Rae Lake |
13 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
100% |
3 |
Rankin
Inlet |
45 |
38 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
19 |
76% |
20 |
Red Deer |
17 |
12 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
24 |
71% |
16 |
Regina |
32 |
21 |
4 |
6 |
1 |
11 |
90% |
14 |
Repulse
Bay |
8 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
9 |
83% |
8 |
Resolute
Bay |
27 |
26 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
12 |
89% |
10 |
Sachs
Harbour |
13 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
8 |
100% |
8 |
Sandspit |
55 |
26 |
3 |
25 |
1 |
15 |
87% |
17 |
Saskatoon |
26 |
20 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
96% |
7 |
Slave
Lake |
39 |
17 |
0 |
22 |
0 |
10 |
97% |
15 |
Smithers |
15 |
11 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
93% |
9 |
Springbank |
26 |
18 |
1 |
7 |
0 |
17 |
77% |
6 |
Stony
Rapids |
54 |
27 |
3 |
24 |
0 |
15 |
78% |
21 |
Swift
Current |
74 |
42 |
7 |
21 |
4 |
17 |
69% |
23 |
Taloyoak |
13 |
10 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
23 |
62% |
22 |
Terrace |
34 |
22 |
0 |
9 |
3 |
20 |
71% |
18 |
Teslin |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
100% |
0 |
The Pas |
29 |
25 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
19 |
79% |
8 |
Thompson |
33 |
28 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
94% |
9 |
Tofino |
3 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
100% |
4 |
Tuktoyaktuk |
10 |
7 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
15 |
90% |
8 |
Vancouver |
8 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
88% |
5 |
Victoria |
10 |
8 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
11 |
100% |
7 |
Victoria
Harbour |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
13 |
100% |
0 |
Watson
Lake |
4 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
4 |
100% |
2 |
Wekweeti |
56 |
33 |
2 |
21 |
0 |
12 |
89% |
13 |
Whitecourt |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
83% |
2 |
Whitehorse |
13 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
17 |
69% |
10 |
Williams
Lake |
13 |
12 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
100% |
7 |
Winnipeg |
39 |
32 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
12 |
87% |
11 |
Yellowknife |
47 |
42 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
10 |
87% |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notat: La scénario indique les
critères d'amendement qui est utilisé dans le calcul du temps de réponse de
l'amendement. Le scénario ‘NC_CRITERIA’ utilise tous les MANAIR (Document de
normes) des critères d'amendement définies à la section 2.9 TAF modifiées, à l'exception
du seuil 2500/6, plafond et visibilité (lorsque les conditions réelles sont
mieux que prévu), Obscurations, et Vent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|