TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: September    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 2031 1321 90 595 25 14 84% 1110
Edmonton 1965 1265 93 560 47 14 84% 1029
National 3996 2586 183 1155 72 14 84% 2139
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.