TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: September    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 2059 1348 96 597 18 13 84% 1099
Edmonton 1943 1300 92 500 51 15 81% 1051
National 4002 2648 188 1097 69 14 83% 2150
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.