TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: October    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 1964 1267 88 589 20 14 83% 898
Edmonton 3028 2071 177 710 70 15 81% 1223
National 4992 3338 265 1299 90 15 81% 2121
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.