TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: November    Year: 2014    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 3117 2056 165 873 23 16 77% 1014
Edmonton 3114 2206 187 680 41 15 80% 1231
National 6231 4262 352 1553 64 15 79% 2245
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.