TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: May    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 2109 1386 114 579 30 16 79% 1113
Edmonton 1968 1339 109 464 56 14 84% 993
National 4077 2725 223 1043 86 15 82% 2106
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.