TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: June    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 1928 1314 96 501 17 14 84% 1519
Edmonton 1622 1076 88 404 54 14 83% 1112
National 3550 2390 184 905 71 14 83% 2631
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.