TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: Jun    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 1789 1225 87 452 25 14 81% 1345
Edmonton 1676 1098 98 443 37 14 84% 1016
National 3465 2323 185 895 62 14 82% 2361
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.