TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: July    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 1777 1154 89 513 21 13 84% 1463
Edmonton 1634 1111 91 392 40 13 85% 1210
National 3411 2265 180 905 61 13 85% 2673
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.