TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: Jul    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 2019 1346 112 528 33 14 83% 1512
Edmonton 2045 1371 124 511 39 14 83% 1229
National 4064 2717 236 1039 72 14 83% 2741
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.