TAF Amendment Response Time Results by Issuing Office
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: February    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
EC Weather Centre Location Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Montreal 2844 1794 140 877 33 15 80% 1278
Edmonton 2505 1697 146 591 71 15 80% 1057
National 5349 3491 286 1468 104 15 80% 2335
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.