TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: September    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 18 12 1 5 0 14 72% 18
Bathurst 15 12 1 2 0 12 87% 19
Big Trout Lake 30 17 0 13 0 11 97% 29
Blanc Sablon 29 28 0 1 0 14 83% 12
Buttonville 16 11 1 4 0 10 94% 13
Cartwright 17 15 0 0 2 12 87% 9
Chapleau 6 6 0 0 0 12 83% 8
Charlottetown 23 19 2 2 0 12 83% 23
Chibougamau-Chapais 14 11 0 3 0 23 71% 8
Churchill Falls 48 19 1 28 0 10 85% 24
Deer Lake 22 18 1 3 0 18 68% 16
Dorval 5 2 0 3 0 12 100% 9
Dryden 63 24 2 37 0 11 89% 27
Earlton 13 7 0 6 0 14 85% 8
Fredericton 25 18 3 4 0 12 96% 18
Gander 56 45 5 5 1 12 93% 22
Gaspé 11 9 0 2 0 14 91% 18
Gatineau 7 7 0 0 0 11 71% 0
Geraldton 31 28 2 1 0 13 97% 27
Gore Bay 9 5 0 4 0 11 89% 9
Halifax 41 34 5 2 0 13 83% 21
Hamilton 17 13 1 3 0 13 82% 14
Havre St Pierre 24 17 0 7 0 13 88% 18
Îles de la Madeleine 18 12 1 5 0 16 78% 11
Inukjuak 46 22 2 19 3 17 72% 23
Ivujivik 7 6 0 0 1 9 100% 15
Kapuskasing 17 15 0 2 0 17 88% 12
Kenora 28 24 3 1 0 13 93% 30
Kingston 5 4 0 1 0 11 80% 8
Kuujjuaq 27 21 2 4 0 17 81% 7
Kuujjuarapik 36 16 3 16 1 15 86% 13
La Grande IV 16 4 0 12 0 9 94% 8
La Grande Rivière 37 33 1 2 1 14 81% 8
London 24 13 1 10 0 12 88% 15
Marathon 11 10 0 1 0 13 100% 6
Mary's Harbour 43 20 1 21 1 17 71% 13
Mirabel 18 15 3 0 0 20 67% 9
Moncton 24 18 0 6 0 14 75% 21
Mont-Joli 19 15 2 2 0 15 79% 15
Moosonee 16 4 1 10 1 14 73% 14
Muskoka 23 8 0 14 1 9 86% 6
Nain 14 10 2 1 1 19 69% 6
Natashquan 26 14 3 9 0 17 88% 14
North Bay 33 23 2 7 1 17 75% 16
Ottawa 17 14 3 0 0 12 82% 8
Peterborough 21 9 0 11 1 10 95% 11
Pickle Lake 9 6 0 2 1 17 75% 6
Puvirnituq 53 25 2 26 0 14 83% 19
Quaqtaq 1 1 0 0 0 10 100% 3
Quebec City 24 18 0 6 0 17 88% 9
Red Lake 20 18 0 1 1 12 89% 6
Roberval 14 11 0 2 1 19 77% 7
Sable Island 15 11 0 4 0 16 80% 5
Saint John 48 38 2 8 0 17 83% 26
Sarnia 34 3 0 31 0 12 91% 11
Sault Ste Marie 22 16 1 5 0 13 82% 24
Schefferville 56 22 1 33 0 10 89% 23
Sept-Îles 20 19 0 1 0 12 90% 10
Sherbrooke 24 14 0 10 0 8 92% 7
Sioux Lookout 25 22 0 3 0 13 88% 16
St Anthony 58 33 3 21 1 14 81% 20
St Catharines 5 3 0 2 0 22 60% 6
St Hubert 47 6 4 37 0 11 85% 15
St John's 43 39 2 2 0 11 93% 22
Stephenville 36 31 0 5 0 14 81% 19
Sudbury 23 22 0 0 1 14 91% 17
Sydney 30 25 2 1 2 25 68% 12
Tasiujaq 7 7 0 0 0 11 100% 8
Thunder Bay 15 10 2 2 1 11 93% 19
Timmins 24 22 1 1 0 19 79% 14
Toronto City Centre 40 9 1 30 0 10 92% 12
Toronto LBPI 8 7 0 1 0 9 88% 9
Trois rivieres 29 16 3 10 0 11 93% 8
Val-d'Or 34 23 1 10 0 16 76% 13
Wabush 43 23 5 14 1 15 81% 20
Waskaganish 3 3 0 0 0 7 100% 0
Waterloo/Wellington 40 14 1 25 0 14 82% 10
Wawa 5 4 0 1 0 10 100% 8
Wiarton 22 18 0 3 1 16 71% 6
Windsor 18 16 1 1 0 11 83% 11
Yarmouth 39 32 1 6 0 19 82% 11
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 16 11 1 4 0 9 100% 9
Arctic Bay 4 3 0 1 0 22 75% 3
Arviat 26 20 0 5 1 14 84% 9
Baker Lake 29 20 1 7 1 13 89% 16
Bella Bella 47 19 2 25 1 14 87% 11
Brandon 13 11 1 1 0 12 92% 9
Buffalo Narrows 10 8 0 2 0 13 80% 6
Burwash 6 3 1 2 0 12 83% 3
Calgary Intl 14 12 1 1 0 6 100% 10
Cambridge Bay 22 18 1 2 1 22 67% 12
Campbell River 21 20 0 1 0 14 86% 2
Cape Dorset 41 27 2 11 1 15 78% 33
Castlegar 4 3 0 1 0 17 50% 5
Churchill 26 20 3 2 1 17 84% 17
Clyde River 34 18 4 11 1 17 73% 15
Coral Harbour 31 22 4 5 0 21 74% 23
Cranbrook 4 4 0 0 0 8 100% 6
Deline 10 5 1 4 0 22 60% 3
Dauphin 22 5 1 16 0 18 73% 12
Dawson City 3 3 0 0 0 10 100% 1
Dawson Creek 11 5 0 6 0 9 100% 2
Dease Lake 11 5 0 6 0 14 91% 4
Edmonton Intl 14 11 1 2 0 13 86% 13
Edmonton Villeneuve 21 11 0 10 0 12 81% 7
Estevan 6 3 1 1 1 37 60% 13
Eureka 11 9 0 2 0 14 91% 8
Faro 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 2
Fort Chipewyan 17 4 3 8 2 11 87% 11
Fort Good Hope 18 14 2 2 0 17 67% 1
Fort McMurray 22 12 1 9 0 13 86% 5
Fort McPherson 5 4 0 1 0 11 80% 6
Fort Nelson 13 11 0 2 0 18 77% 5
Fort Simpson 16 13 0 2 1 9 93% 13
Fort Smith 21 18 0 3 0 12 90% 20
Fort St John 9 6 0 2 1 13 100% 11
Gillam 38 34 1 3 0 12 87% 13
Gjoa Haven 45 31 0 14 0 13 84% 18
Grande Prairie 7 5 1 1 0 25 71% 9
Hall Beach 32 20 2 9 1 17 81% 20
Hay River 12 11 0 1 0 13 92% 6
High Level 28 19 0 8 1 10 93% 5
Holman 9 7 0 2 0 15 89% 7
Igloolik 16 12 2 1 1 13 87% 4
Inuvik 34 18 3 10 3 17 74% 14
Iqaluit 22 19 0 3 0 12 82% 8
Island Lake 22 21 0 1 0 12 91% 11
Kamloops 7 6 1 0 0 8 100% 6
Kelowna 12 4 0 8 0 11 92% 5
Key Lake 27 18 1 7 1 13 88% 8
Kugaaruk 11 5 1 5 0 18 82% 11
Kugluktuk 16 14 0 2 0 24 88% 21
La Ronge 20 16 1 3 0 15 75% 15
Lethbridge 10 8 0 2 0 6 100% 9
Lloydminster 27 14 4 9 0 11 81% 5
Lutselk'e 3 3 0 0 0 19 67% 3
Lynn Lake 26 14 0 12 0 13 88% 28
Mackenzie 24 15 1 8 0 10 88% 8
Masset 19 12 3 4 0 21 63% 7
Mayo 8 6 1 1 0 25 75% 2
Medicine Hat 8 8 0 0 0 9 100% 9
Nanaimo 9 7 1 1 0 7 100% 0
Norman Wells 14 11 0 1 2 9 92% 11
North Battleford 20 8 1 11 0 16 85% 12
Norway House 25 12 0 13 0 14 92% 4
Old Crow 6 6 0 0 0 6 100% 3
Pangnirtung 4 2 0 1 1 31 67% 3
Paulatuk 8 4 0 3 1 8 100% 2
Peace River 14 12 0 2 0 20 57% 7
Penticton 1 1 0 0 0 14 100% 4
Pond Inlet 29 16 2 11 0 12 83% 20
Port Hardy 26 23 1 2 0 14 81% 15
Prince Albert 24 19 2 3 0 19 79% 13
Prince George 40 18 2 20 0 14 82% 16
Qikiqtarjuaq 23 14 0 8 1 14 82% 9
Quesnel 34 10 0 21 3 16 81% 15
Rae Lake 9 9 0 0 0 7 100% 4
Rankin Inlet 26 18 3 3 2 19 75% 14
Red Deer 16 12 2 2 0 14 88% 11
Regina 15 10 1 4 0 14 80% 10
Repulse Bay 10 5 2 2 1 16 78% 5
Resolute Bay 50 43 2 5 0 14 86% 30
Sachs Harbour 15 14 0 0 1 6 93% 18
Sandspit 41 19 2 20 0 14 80% 8
Saskatoon 6 5 0 1 0 19 83% 6
Slave Lake 40 14 0 25 1 13 82% 10
Smithers 11 5 0 3 3 18 88% 5
Springbank 15 5 0 8 2 9 100% 10
Stony Rapids 26 11 0 15 0 11 85% 22
Swift Current 45 11 2 32 0 12 84% 9
Taloyoak 21 14 0 5 2 23 68% 16
Terrace 13 10 0 3 0 11 92% 18
Teslin 4 3 0 0 1 30 33% 1
The Pas 19 17 1 1 0 12 89% 6
Thompson 14 11 1 2 0 14 71% 9
Tofino 18 12 2 3 1 13 94% 12
Tuktoyaktuk 10 8 0 2 0 20 90% 6
Vancouver 10 9 1 0 0 9 90% 6
Victoria 9 7 1 1 0 18 89% 5
Victoria Harbour 2 2 0 0 0 8 100% 5
Watson Lake 5 4 0 1 0 16 60% 6
Wekweeti 23 17 0 6 0 10 96% 10
Whitecourt 7 5 0 1 1 17 83% 0
Whitehorse 6 4 2 0 0 10 100% 5
Williams Lake 16 12 2 2 0 12 94% 7
Winnipeg 15 15 0 0 0 8 100% 13
Yellowknife 12 11 0 1 0 12 92% 11
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.