TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenario: NC_CRITERIA    Month: September    Year: 2014    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 14 8 3 3 0 14 86% 12
Bathurst 19 16 0 3 0 12 79% 5
Big Trout Lake 53 17 4 30 2 18 75% 25
Blanc Sablon 34 29 2 3 0 20 76% 9
Buttonville 22 20 1 1 0 12 77% 22
Cartwright 11 9 0 2 0 12 91% 4
Chapleau 13 11 0 0 2 11 82% 11
Charlottetown 16 16 0 0 0 13 75% 5
Chibougamau-Chapais 6 5 0 1 0 19 67% 8
Churchill Falls 8 2 0 6 0 12 88% 2
Deer Lake 6 6 0 0 0 12 67% 5
Dorval 13 7 0 6 0 12 85% 13
Dryden 35 25 2 8 0 12 86% 21
Earlton 14 3 1 10 0 10 93% 7
Fredericton 35 21 1 13 0 14 80% 18
Gander 27 19 2 6 0 16 74% 7
Gaspé 5 5 0 0 0 15 100% 4
Gatineau 12 10 1 1 0 16 75% 8
Geraldton 41 36 4 1 0 15 83% 12
Gore Bay 7 4 0 3 0 8 100% 10
Halifax 34 30 1 3 0 11 88% 14
Hamilton 21 17 2 2 0 16 67% 9
Havre St Pierre 51 32 2 17 0 12 78% 10
Îles de la Madeleine 8 8 0 0 0 12 100% 3
Inukjuak 51 24 1 26 0 13 88% 16
Ivujivik 8 6 0 2 0 12 88% 6
Kapuskasing 29 25 2 2 0 16 86% 12
Kenora 29 24 2 3 0 11 90% 14
Kingston 9 8 0 1 0 14 78% 4
Kuujjuaq 24 18 1 5 0 12 92% 10
Kuujjuarapik 39 13 1 25 0 8 95% 18
La Grande IV 12 3 0 9 0 7 100% 8
La Grande Rivière 37 29 2 6 0 16 76% 17
London 40 28 5 7 0 16 70% 27
Marathon 12 12 0 0 0 15 75% 10
Mary's Harbour 13 9 0 4 0 9 92% 11
Mirabel 21 19 1 1 0 12 86% 14
Moncton 24 19 0 5 0 12 92% 7
Mont-Joli 13 12 1 0 0 11 92% 7
Moosonee 13 9 0 4 0 13 85% 11
Muskoka 19 8 0 10 1 9 94% 10
Nain 16 14 2 0 0 13 88% 8
Natashquan 33 20 1 12 0 13 91% 9
North Bay 39 25 1 13 0 13 85% 35
Ottawa 17 15 1 1 0 13 82% 15
Peterborough 35 21 0 13 1 11 91% 22
Pickle Lake 17 15 0 2 0 12 82% 14
Puvirnituq 27 16 3 8 0 12 89% 25
Quaqtaq 6 6 0 0 0 8 100% 5
Quebec City 15 10 2 3 0 13 80% 17
Red Lake 17 14 1 2 0 16 65% 12
Roberval 12 12 0 0 0 9 100% 4
Sable Island 28 17 0 11 0 11 96% 6
Saint John 33 29 3 1 0 14 85% 15
Sarnia 25 8 1 16 0 13 92% 11
Sault Ste Marie 33 27 3 3 0 17 73% 15
Schefferville 51 19 3 29 0 12 88% 19
Sept-Îles 18 14 0 4 0 13 72% 10
Sherbrooke 28 10 0 16 2 11 88% 6
Sioux Lookout 23 20 2 1 0 13 91% 13
St Anthony 28 16 2 10 0 13 86% 7
St Catharines 6 6 0 0 0 9 100% 2
St Hubert 16 2 2 12 0 9 94% 13
St John's 28 22 3 3 0 21 75% 15
Stephenville 19 16 0 3 0 10 89% 2
Sudbury 21 17 2 2 0 12 86% 13
Sydney 24 21 2 1 0 14 79% 19
Tasiujaq 6 6 0 0 0 11 83% 2
Thunder Bay 15 12 1 2 0 9 93% 27
Timmins 18 15 2 1 0 17 78% 16
Toronto City Centre 17 10 2 5 0 11 88% 15
Toronto LBPI 9 9 0 0 0 9 100% 13
Trois rivieres 44 23 5 16 0 11 91% 15
Val-d'Or 18 16 1 1 0 10 100% 9
Wabush 15 10 0 5 0 18 73% 9
Waskaganish 7 4 0 2 1 11 83% 4
Waterloo/Wellington 38 23 0 13 2 9 89% 13
Wawa 17 17 0 0 0 12 88% 10
Wiarton 11 8 2 1 0 19 64% 11
Windsor 17 13 1 3 0 14 82% 16
Yarmouth 29 23 2 4 0 15 83% 15
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 19 17 0 2 0 18 74% 9
Arctic Bay 1 1 0 0 0 14 100% 3
Arviat 40 15 6 19 0 19 65% 10
Baker Lake 18 13 4 1 0 9 89% 5
Bella Bella 34 11 1 21 1 15 76% 3
Brandon 13 10 1 2 0 17 77% 11
Buffalo Narrows 12 12 0 0 0 7 100% 9
Burwash 30 19 1 10 0 16 70% 6
Calgary Intl 17 12 1 4 0 17 71% 12
Cambridge Bay 45 39 4 2 0 18 62% 13
Campbell River 12 9 1 2 0 24 67% 1
Cape Dorset 40 18 4 16 2 17 68% 8
Castlegar 4 2 2 0 0 50 50% 2
Churchill 28 22 3 1 2 15 77% 10
Clyde River 68 19 6 43 0 15 72% 19
Coral Harbour 11 9 1 1 0 8 91% 3
Cranbrook 8 5 2 1 0 23 75% 0
Deline 4 3 1 0 0 9 100% 4
Dauphin 31 20 0 11 0 15 77% 5
Dawson City 4 4 0 0 0 16 75% 1
Dawson Creek 4 2 1 1 0 13 75% 11
Dease Lake 6 4 0 2 0 7 100% 1
Edmonton Intl 12 8 2 2 0 11 92% 11
Edmonton Villeneuve 20 11 2 7 0 16 80% 14
Estevan 9 7 0 0 2 8 100% 3
Eureka 9 8 1 0 0 10 100% 3
Faro 8 7 0 1 0 17 75% 3
Fort Chipewyan 16 9 1 6 0 13 88% 1
Fort Good Hope 7 7 0 0 0 18 86% 7
Fort McMurray 18 11 2 5 0 12 89% 17
Fort McPherson 7 6 0 1 0 5 100% 13
Fort Nelson 19 15 2 1 1 19 78% 13
Fort Simpson 20 19 0 1 0 9 85% 13
Fort Smith 14 11 0 3 0 13 86% 17
Fort St John 22 19 1 2 0 16 86% 7
Gillam 36 30 3 3 0 21 81% 9
Gjoa Haven 57 21 4 29 3 20 74% 8
Grande Prairie 12 10 0 2 0 12 75% 11
Hall Beach 37 19 5 13 0 19 62% 9
Hay River 11 11 0 0 0 10 82% 9
High Level 10 8 2 0 0 13 70% 12
Holman 4 3 0 1 0 10 100% 12
Igloolik 12 6 0 4 2 32 30% 9
Inuvik 21 20 0 1 0 17 76% 11
Iqaluit 22 14 3 4 1 16 76% 8
Island Lake 25 21 2 2 0 23 64% 9
Kamloops 4 3 0 1 0 13 100% 3
Kelowna 28 8 1 19 0 15 79% 5
Key Lake 23 19 0 4 0 9 91% 10
Kugaaruk 13 9 1 3 0 15 85% 6
Kugluktuk 17 10 2 5 0 16 76% 6
La Ronge 15 13 1 1 0 9 87% 2
Lethbridge 25 15 2 8 0 24 56% 6
Lloydminster 11 10 0 1 0 12 82% 6
Lutselk'e 2 1 0 0 1 11 100% 7
Lynn Lake 25 12 1 11 1 12 88% 12
Mackenzie 11 6 0 5 0 10 100% 7
Masset 16 11 0 4 1 17 67% 6
Mayo 12 9 2 1 0 14 75% 8
Medicine Hat 15 13 0 1 1 10 86% 6
Nanaimo 7 5 2 0 0 23 71% 2
Norman Wells 11 8 1 0 2 7 100% 13
North Battleford 25 8 2 15 0 18 84% 4
Norway House 31 23 1 7 0 13 81% 7
Old Crow 2 2 0 0 0 8 100% 2
Pangnirtung 6 5 0 1 0 22 67% 4
Paulatuk 12 10 1 1 0 12 83% 10
Peace River 15 13 1 1 0 10 93% 11
Penticton 2 2 0 0 0 14 50% 7
Pond Inlet 27 13 4 9 1 21 58% 12
Port Hardy 26 22 3 1 0 12 88% 10
Prince Albert 15 14 1 0 0 5 100% 8
Prince George 28 11 6 11 0 13 79% 13
Qikiqtarjuaq 31 17 2 12 0 17 77% 11
Quesnel 34 20 1 13 0 15 76% 17
Rae Lake 3 3 0 0 0 8 100% 3
Rankin Inlet 23 17 2 4 0 19 65% 9
Red Deer 19 17 1 1 0 9 89% 3
Regina 16 11 4 1 0 8 94% 8
Repulse Bay 12 8 0 4 0 21 58% 2
Resolute 42 31 6 5 0 17 71% 14
Sachs Harbour 8 8 0 0 0 10 100% 13
Sandspit 55 23 5 27 0 15 80% 10
Saskatoon 8 7 1 0 0 10 88% 5
Slave Lake 11 4 0 7 0 16 73% 14
Smithers 6 3 0 2 1 10 80% 3
Springbank 26 12 1 12 1 11 88% 13
Stony Rapids 24 11 1 12 0 14 83% 14
Swift Current 35 17 0 18 0 14 77% 11
Taloyoak 24 18 3 2 1 16 83% 7
Terrace 8 5 0 3 0 14 88% 3
Teslin 9 8 0 0 1 5 100% 5
The Pas 17 15 0 2 0 8 88% 10
Thompson 24 21 1 2 0 16 88% 14
Tofino 13 13 0 0 0 22 62% 8
Tuktoyaktuk 21 19 0 1 1 13 70% 15
Vancouver 13 10 1 2 0 17 69% 8
Victoria 9 5 0 4 0 22 78% 7
Victoria Harbour 11 9 0 2 0 12 91% 6
Watson Lake 8 6 1 1 0 16 75% 5
Wekweeti 22 11 2 9 0 15 82% 10
Whitecourt 11 9 0 2 0 9 82% 5
Whitehorse 9 7 1 1 0 15 78% 10
Williams Lake 5 5 0 0 0 8 100% 7
Winnipeg 23 18 2 3 0 7 91% 15
Yellowknife 17 14 0 3 0 13 71% 8
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.