TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: October    Year: 2014    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station	Number of observations not covered by current TAF	Number responded to by an amended TAF	Number responded to by next regular TAF	Number where weather changed back to match TAF	Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent	Average response time in minutes	Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes	Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau	31	19	2	10	0	11	94%	14
Bathurst	18	14	0	3	1	18	65%	7
Big Trout Lake	61	27	6	28	0	14	77%	16
Blanc Sablon	30	23	0	6	1	18	76%	9
Buttonville	39	31	3	5	0	17	79%	16
Cartwright	15	12	0	2	1	21	71%	5
Chapleau	18	14	0	4	0	18	61%	9
Charlottetown	24	21	1	2	0	15	83%	10
Chibougamau-Chapais	13	6	0	6	1	15	83%	6
Churchill Falls	35	23	1	11	0	13	80%	12
Deer Lake	7	5	0	2	0	9	86%	11
Dorval	19	11	3	5	0	12	89%	6
Dryden	47	26	3	18	0	14	77%	14
Earlton	25	8	0	16	1	10	92%	13
Fredericton	46	25	0	21	0	14	87%	24
Gander	49	37	4	8	0	18	73%	17
Gaspé	29	21	2	6	0	19	83%	12
Gatineau	18	15	1	0	2	11	75%	7
Geraldton	51	44	2	5	0	18	73%	16
Gore Bay	11	8	0	3	0	15	82%	12
Halifax	42	37	3	1	1	15	83%	15
Hamilton	30	24	5	0	1	15	72%	8
Havre St Pierre	30	19	1	10	0	12	93%	17
Îles de la Madeleine	11	8	1	2	0	16	82%	6
Inukjuak	55	35	3	17	0	15	78%	20
Ivujivik	6	4	0	2	0	10	100%	7
Kapuskasing	50	42	2	6	0	16	82%	27
Kenora	32	29	1	2	0	13	78%	11
Kingston	14	10	0	4	0	17	86%	3
Kuujjuaq	25	20	1	4	0	16	76%	12
Kuujjuarapik	58	31	4	23	0	10	88%	22
La Grande IV	13	7	0	6	0	11	92%	3
La Grande Rivière	39	34	1	4	0	14	85%	13
London	27	19	3	5	0	15	81%	14
Marathon	14	11	0	3	0	11	100%	4
Mary's Harbour	34	19	1	14	0	17	74%	11
Mirabel	21	17	0	4	0	14	81%	8
Moncton	37	29	1	7	0	13	89%	20
Mont-Joli	19	14	2	3	0	19	58%	12
Moosonee	22	12	1	9	0	13	82%	10
Muskoka	42	18	1	20	3	9	90%	10
Nain	13	11	0	2	0	23	69%	10
Natashquan	54	24	5	25	0	20	67%	12
North Bay	48	38	3	7	0	13	83%	20
Ottawa	23	19	1	3	0	17	70%	7
Peterborough	24	11	1	12	0	12	92%	11
Pickle Lake	21	16	1	2	2	17	74%	6
Puvirnituq	55	50	2	3	0	11	96%	11
Quaqtaq	15	11	0	2	2	24	69%	8
Quebec City	30	25	1	3	1	14	86%	9
Red Lake	28	22	2	4	0	13	82%	6
Roberval	15	10	1	3	1	18	71%	4
Sable Island	21	15	0	5	1	14	90%	12
Saint John	44	36	1	7	0	21	66%	22
Sarnia	23	10	0	13	0	13	87%	6
Sault Ste Marie	39	28	2	9	0	15	79%	19
Schefferville	35	14	2	16	3	23	62%	7
Sept-Îles	25	19	2	4	0	14	76%	11
Sherbrooke	24	10	0	14	0	9	92%	8
Sioux Lookout	28	22	2	4	0	17	64%	11
St Anthony	42	23	6	12	1	19	66%	11
St Catharines	5	4	0	1	0	18	60%	2
St Hubert	37	12	0	25	0	12	89%	10
St John's	56	39	5	9	3	19	72%	27
Stephenville	23	19	1	2	1	14	77%	8
Sudbury	36	27	4	5	0	14	81%	30
Sydney	45	28	6	11	0	18	62%	9
Tasiujaq	6	6	0	0	0	11	83%	7
Thunder Bay	22	20	0	2	0	14	82%	5
Timmins	40	35	1	4	0	14	85%	21
Toronto City Centre	41	18	1	22	0	11	90%	23
Toronto LBPI	18	14	2	2	0	13	83%	16
Trois rivieres	30	13	3	14	0	16	83%	14
Val-d'Or	58	36	3	18	1	10	93%	14
Wabush	41	17	3	21	0	15	71%	17
Waskaganish	9	7	0	2	0	15	67%	2
Waterloo/Wellington	38	20	3	12	3	12	80%	8
Wawa	15	12	1	1	1	16	86%	6
Wiarton	24	19	1	4	0	12	83%	4
Windsor	25	15	2	8	0	16	76%	9
Yarmouth	36	31	1	4	0	12	92%	14
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station	Number of observations not covered by current TAF	Number responded to by an amended TAF	Number responded to by next regular TAF	Number where weather changed back to match TAF	Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent	Average response time in minutes	Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes	Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford	24	18	2	4	0	14	75%	12
Arctic Bay	1	1	0	0	0	23	0%	1
Arviat	89	39	12	38	0	17	74%	17
Baker Lake	25	23	0	2	0	12	88%	11
Bella Bella	53	19	3	31	0	8	96%	11
Brandon	4	3	0	1	0	8	100%	7
Buffalo Narrows	9	6	1	2	0	18	67%	4
Burwash	43	27	5	10	1	17	69%	9
Calgary Intl	3	3	0	0	0	33	33%	12
Cambridge Bay	45	36	6	3	0	21	69%	26
Campbell River	33	27	4	2	0	17	82%	6
Cape Dorset	64	30	4	30	0	23	64%	22
Castlegar	7	7	0	0	0	15	71%	4
Churchill	62	49	5	6	2	15	83%	21
Clyde River	48	21	3	24	0	16	71%	18
Coral Harbour	24	18	3	2	1	21	57%	10
Cranbrook	6	5	1	0	0	17	83%	2
Deline	12	11	0	1	0	9	92%	9
Dauphin	29	12	0	17	0	13	83%	11
Dawson City	16	10	3	1	2	13	71%	6
Dawson Creek	24	9	0	14	1	16	74%	13
Dease Lake	19	6	2	11	0	9	89%	9
Edmonton Intl	13	8	3	2	0	9	92%	10
Edmonton Villeneuve	19	13	1	5	0	17	79%	13
Estevan	14	12	0	2	0	13	93%	3
Eureka	13	12	1	0	0	19	62%	7
Faro	6	3	2	1	0	20	50%	3
Fort Chipewyan	12	9	1	1	1	10	91%	4
Fort Good Hope	8	7	1	0	0	17	62%	4
Fort McMurray	48	24	1	23	0	14	83%	11
Fort McPherson	8	6	1	0	1	13	86%	5
Fort Nelson	69	55	6	7	1	14	74%	21
Fort Simpson	44	38	1	4	1	17	77%	23
Fort Smith	50	37	7	6	0	17	76%	20
Fort St John	25	20	2	2	1	16	75%	14
Gillam	64	47	9	7	1	16	75%	17
Gjoa Haven	45	25	2	16	2	18	77%	29
Grande Prairie	24	21	2	1	0	17	79%	10
Hall Beach	50	33	3	14	0	17	74%	11
Hay River	46	37	3	6	0	11	87%	23
High Level	44	32	4	8	0	15	77%	24
Holman	4	3	0	0	1	8	100%	21
Igloolik	15	8	0	3	4	19	64%	17
Inuvik	40	35	2	3	0	14	78%	17
Iqaluit	33	28	4	1	0	15	82%	12
Island Lake	32	25	4	3	0	12	88%	5
Kamloops	3	3	0	0	0	14	67%	3
Kelowna	18	7	1	10	0	11	83%	6
Key Lake	48	28	1	17	2	12	89%	7
Kugaaruk	13	11	0	2	0	19	69%	12
Kugluktuk	29	22	3	4	0	26	59%	10
La Ronge	14	10	2	1	1	23	77%	6
Lethbridge	10	7	2	1	0	11	90%	16
Lloydminster	35	17	4	14	0	13	77%	8
Lutselk'e	9	6	1	0	2	16	71%	5
Lynn Lake	77	41	8	25	3	15	80%	17
Mackenzie	30	9	1	18	2	10	93%	8
Masset	19	11	2	4	2	16	71%	4
Mayo	14	9	3	2	0	14	71%	4
Medicine Hat	9	5	2	2	0	26	56%	13
Nanaimo	16	13	2	1	0	17	62%	1
Norman Wells	35	27	6	2	0	13	80%	26
North Battleford	6	3	0	3	0	14	67%	8
Norway House	47	18	3	23	3	14	84%	15
Old Crow	16	13	3	0	0	20	56%	10
Pangnirtung	3	1	1	0	1	29	50%	3
Paulatuk	14	13	1	0	0	10	93%	9
Peace River	21	18	0	3	0	18	81%	13
Penticton	2	0	0	2	0	22	50%	1
Pond Inlet	24	17	0	7	0	20	79%	7
Port Hardy	15	11	1	3	0	12	87%	10
Prince Albert	9	8	0	1	0	13	78%	6
Prince George	46	23	3	20	0	14	78%	20
Qikiqtarjuaq	39	21	3	15	0	17	77%	11
Quesnel	16	10	1	5	0	15	81%	12
Rae Lake	9	4	2	2	1	20	75%	6
Rankin Inlet	33	23	5	5	0	17	64%	19
Red Deer	9	8	0	1	0	17	78%	9
Regina	22	15	2	5	0	15	77%	6
Repulse Bay	17	9	0	5	3	25	57%	2
Resolute	36	30	3	3	0	21	67%	15
Sachs Harbour	7	6	0	0	1	11	83%	9
Sandspit	66	27	3	36	0	14	82%	14
Saskatoon	14	13	0	1	0	14	93%	2
Slave Lake	29	13	2	13	1	22	75%	10
Smithers	20	15	1	3	1	19	63%	7
Springbank	8	5	0	2	1	10	100%	5
Stony Rapids	28	16	2	10	0	14	89%	14
Swift Current	15	11	1	3	0	12	80%	8
Taloyoak	29	24	3	1	1	15	79%	7
Terrace	50	40	3	5	2	20	71%	15
Teslin	9	6	0	3	0	28	78%	1
The Pas	36	29	2	5	0	15	81%	6
Thompson	50	38	6	5	1	18	73%	7
Tofino	16	7	1	6	2	18	71%	10
Tuktoyaktuk	27	22	2	3	0	18	74%	6
Vancouver	25	14	3	8	0	15	84%	11
Victoria	41	22	7	12	0	17	73%	14
Victoria Harbour	15	13	2	0	0	17	67%	5
Watson Lake	36	32	3	1	0	18	69%	5
Wekweeti	31	15	0	13	3	15	75%	10
Whitecourt	16	11	3	1	1	19	67%	0
Whitehorse	26	21	3	2	0	16	81%	9
Williams Lake	12	9	1	2	0	23	42%	7
Winnipeg	8	7	1	0	0	16	75%	12
Yellowknife	63	48	8	6	1	17	74%	22
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.