TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: November    Year: 2014    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 45 25 1 19 0 12 82% 16
Bathurst 30 25 1 2 2 13 79% 12
Big Trout Lake 62 32 3 27 0 16 73% 13
Blanc Sablon 43 31 4 8 0 15 79% 10
Buttonville 33 24 3 6 0 17 70% 12
Cartwright 24 21 0 3 0 11 83% 5
Chapleau 26 25 1 0 0 13 81% 7
Charlottetown 44 39 4 1 0 13 84% 16
Chibougamau-Chapais 25 17 1 7 0 12 92% 8
Churchill Falls 59 27 6 26 0 15 78% 17
Deer Lake 37 26 2 9 0 14 81% 11
Dorval 30 21 5 4 0 14 80% 6
Dryden 74 36 1 37 0 14 77% 17
Earlton 29 17 1 10 1 13 86% 8
Fredericton 52 32 1 19 0 15 79% 20
Gander 57 42 1 14 0 23 68% 12
Gaspé 20 17 1 2 0 16 75% 15
Gatineau 8 5 0 2 1 11 86% 6
Geraldton 33 23 6 4 0 19 82% 16
Gore Bay 37 16 3 16 2 14 77% 12
Halifax 55 38 4 13 0 15 78% 31
Hamilton 36 26 4 5 1 23 57% 15
Havre St Pierre 63 34 3 26 0 13 89% 8
Îles de la Madeleine 19 15 1 3 0 21 79% 14
Inukjuak 68 28 6 33 1 15 87% 37
Ivujivik 7 7 0 0 0 9 100% 6
Kapuskasing 51 40 5 6 0 19 63% 8
Kenora 40 33 1 6 0 17 70% 11
Kingston 12 10 1 1 0 15 75% 5
Kuujjuaq 35 28 3 4 0 18 63% 10
Kuujjuarapik 53 31 1 21 0 15 79% 20
La Grande IV 35 17 0 17 1 12 85% 9
La Grande Rivière 42 34 2 5 1 17 61% 17
London 47 29 4 14 0 14 81% 13
Marathon 17 12 2 1 2 14 80% 3
Mary's Harbour 42 18 3 21 0 11 86% 14
Mirabel 30 26 2 2 0 17 80% 13
Moncton 43 37 0 6 0 16 77% 13
Mont-Joli 25 19 1 5 0 14 84% 9
Moosonee 30 14 1 14 1 14 76% 9
Muskoka 48 23 0 25 0 17 75% 10
Nain 15 12 1 2 0 14 67% 9
Natashquan 75 41 3 30 1 13 89% 18
North Bay 79 53 5 21 0 15 72% 18
Ottawa 21 14 2 5 0 21 67% 7
Peterborough 33 15 0 17 1 15 66% 6
Pickle Lake 16 13 0 3 0 14 88% 10
Puvirnituq 30 25 1 4 0 13 80% 15
Quaqtaq 11 8 0 3 0 14 91% 7
Quebec City 39 23 7 8 1 19 61% 19
Red Lake 37 29 0 7 1 17 78% 7
Roberval 23 19 2 2 0 17 83% 6
Sable Island 33 12 1 19 1 18 75% 19
Saint John 48 43 1 4 0 15 81% 19
Sarnia 13 6 0 6 1 11 83% 4
Sault Ste Marie 51 35 3 13 0 17 73% 19
Schefferville 77 37 5 35 0 13 84% 17
Sept-Îles 41 34 0 7 0 16 73% 7
Sherbrooke 35 15 0 19 1 14 76% 11
Sioux Lookout 41 32 2 7 0 20 68% 9
St Anthony 73 40 2 31 0 14 81% 12
St Catharines 11 11 0 0 0 13 91% 4
St Hubert 48 24 2 21 1 15 81% 15
St John's 49 37 5 7 0 18 80% 21
Stephenville 31 25 2 4 0 19 65% 17
Sudbury 65 46 8 11 0 20 69% 17
Sydney 41 33 2 6 0 13 85% 17
Tasiujaq 8 8 0 0 0 16 62% 6
Thunder Bay 22 18 1 3 0 13 77% 6
Timmins 45 36 5 4 0 17 64% 17
Toronto City Centre 34 19 1 14 0 17 76% 11
Toronto LBPI 19 13 1 5 0 13 74% 18
Trois rivieres 32 14 0 18 0 18 78% 11
Val-d'Or 69 45 3 21 0 17 71% 17
Wabush 55 34 2 19 0 20 73% 15
Waskaganish 8 8 0 0 0 14 88% 3
Waterloo/Wellington 43 22 1 20 0 10 91% 7
Wawa 20 15 0 5 0 15 65% 8
Wiarton 34 19 3 11 1 18 76% 11
Windsor 25 21 1 3 0 17 72% 10
Yarmouth 46 39 3 4 0 17 67% 14
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 21 20 1 0 0 16 81% 9
Arctic Bay 2 1 1 0 0 12 100% 3
Arviat 65 27 8 30 0 25 62% 19
Baker Lake 25 24 0 1 0 15 80% 12
Bella Bella 18 5 0 13 0 9 100% 7
Brandon 29 23 3 3 0 15 72% 3
Buffalo Narrows 27 20 3 4 0 15 78% 12
Burwash 36 27 3 6 0 15 69% 16
Calgary Intl 43 35 4 4 0 11 95% 31
Cambridge Bay 26 20 4 1 1 14 84% 19
Campbell River 18 13 2 2 1 19 82% 8
Cape Dorset 51 32 2 17 0 16 73% 13
Castlegar 18 12 1 3 2 15 69% 6
Churchill 47 40 3 4 0 15 81% 28
Clyde River 47 21 3 23 0 14 72% 8
Coral Harbour 21 16 4 1 0 15 81% 10
Cranbrook 26 22 4 0 0 18 77% 12
Deline 13 7 2 3 1 21 58% 2
Dauphin 20 10 2 8 0 9 90% 11
Dawson City 9 9 0 0 0 12 89% 0
Dawson Creek 43 14 5 24 0 13 84% 9
Dease Lake 24 10 2 9 3 19 67% 5
Edmonton Intl 33 24 5 4 0 9 97% 18
Edmonton Villeneuve 49 28 2 19 0 11 90% 20
Estevan 21 16 1 4 0 16 86% 12
Eureka 4 3 1 0 0 8 100% 8
Faro 4 4 0 0 0 10 75% 0
Fort Chipewyan 28 16 1 11 0 12 86% 2
Fort Good Hope 14 13 0 1 0 11 86% 2
Fort McMurray 60 36 1 23 0 14 83% 14
Fort McPherson 12 9 1 1 1 21 73% 4
Fort Nelson 34 27 3 4 0 13 76% 11
Fort Simpson 38 34 0 3 1 11 86% 20
Fort Smith 54 45 2 5 2 20 75% 21
Fort St John 38 33 2 3 0 16 74% 14
Gillam 34 31 2 1 0 12 88% 7
Gjoa Haven 14 13 0 1 0 13 71% 31
Grande Prairie 30 23 4 3 0 15 80% 18
Hall Beach 66 35 3 27 1 16 68% 11
Hay River 47 41 3 3 0 19 79% 16
High Level 30 25 1 4 0 13 80% 28
Holman 6 5 0 0 1 31 40% 13
Igloolik 4 4 0 0 0 4 100% 19
Inuvik 20 18 1 0 1 16 68% 15
Iqaluit 16 15 1 0 0 16 62% 9
Island Lake 33 30 0 3 0 15 79% 7
Kamloops 12 11 0 1 0 12 83% 11
Kelowna 13 5 2 6 0 12 85% 13
Key Lake 37 18 1 18 0 11 89% 8
Kugaaruk 3 2 0 1 0 25 67% 11
Kugluktuk 37 33 2 2 0 15 76% 15
La Ronge 28 25 2 1 0 13 79% 4
Lethbridge 33 21 2 9 1 12 81% 26
Lloydminster 48 35 5 8 0 19 71% 15
Lutselk'e 10 7 2 0 1 27 56% 9
Lynn Lake 46 34 2 10 0 13 91% 11
Mackenzie 48 29 4 13 2 16 72% 8
Masset 14 9 2 1 2 16 75% 7
Mayo 14 14 0 0 0 10 100% 5
Medicine Hat 34 22 4 8 0 17 74% 13
Nanaimo 9 4 1 3 1 15 88% 5
Norman Wells 11 9 1 1 0 17 73% 6
North Battleford 56 37 2 17 0 14 82% 18
Norway House 46 24 5 17 0 11 91% 8
Old Crow 10 7 0 0 3 9 100% 6
Pangnirtung 4 4 0 0 0 12 75% 2
Paulatuk 6 4 0 0 2 15 75% 12
Peace River 47 37 3 7 0 15 81% 8
Penticton 15 14 1 0 0 15 67% 10
Pond Inlet 34 23 4 5 2 16 78% 10
Port Hardy 14 14 0 0 0 13 93% 3
Prince Albert 39 36 2 1 0 12 90% 14
Prince George 65 39 5 21 0 19 69% 18
Qikiqtarjuaq 36 23 0 13 0 17 72% 12
Quesnel 36 20 2 14 0 24 69% 11
Rae Lake 10 9 0 1 0 10 90% 3
Rankin Inlet 23 19 0 3 1 14 86% 10
Red Deer 29 27 0 2 0 11 86% 14
Regina 46 36 2 8 0 14 85% 10
Repulse Bay 13 10 0 2 1 11 92% 7
Resolute 21 19 0 2 0 14 71% 10
Sachs Harbour 8 8 0 0 0 5 100% 14
Sandspit 43 17 1 25 0 14 86% 12
Saskatoon 38 31 1 6 0 14 84% 15
Slave Lake 58 41 2 15 0 17 78% 14
Smithers 36 31 1 4 0 19 69% 14
Springbank 80 21 1 56 2 11 86% 12
Stony Rapids 50 30 3 17 0 12 82% 20
Swift Current 62 29 6 24 3 12 86% 24
Taloyoak 12 11 1 0 0 17 83% 5
Terrace 39 32 3 3 1 12 87% 12
Teslin 7 6 0 0 1 8 83% 1
The Pas 47 42 2 3 0 10 94% 7
Thompson 26 21 3 2 0 12 85% 10
Tofino 11 8 1 1 1 21 60% 4
Tuktoyaktuk 13 12 0 1 0 17 69% 6
Vancouver 16 14 1 1 0 10 94% 11
Victoria 35 28 4 2 1 20 71% 17
Victoria Harbour 9 9 0 0 0 15 78% 9
Watson Lake 13 13 0 0 0 10 100% 5
Wekweeti 21 11 0 9 1 15 85% 4
Whitecourt 12 12 0 0 0 6 100% 6
Whitehorse 42 39 0 3 0 13 83% 21
Williams Lake 35 30 1 4 0 18 77% 13
Winnipeg 23 18 1 4 0 11 87% 19
Yellowknife 40 34 4 2 0 15 82% 27
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.