TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: May    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 36 21 1 14 0 18 72% 21
Bathurst 31 24 0 6 1 21 73% 8
Big Trout Lake 65 21 4 40 0 11 89% 12
Blanc Sablon 33 27 4 0 2 24 74% 14
Buttonville 10 8 0 2 0 12 80% 11
Cartwright 23 20 3 0 0 20 83% 16
Chapleau 11 9 1 1 0 24 73% 7
Charlottetown 48 40 4 2 2 17 76% 15
Chibougamau-Chapais 14 11 0 2 1 14 100% 17
Churchill Falls 28 14 1 13 0 12 86% 17
Deer Lake 23 16 3 2 2 19 81% 15
Dorval 7 4 1 2 0 12 100% 18
Dryden 47 20 2 25 0 10 91% 22
Earlton 7 4 0 3 0 8 100% 3
Fredericton 38 26 1 11 0 14 79% 13
Gander 67 48 5 13 1 14 82% 18
Gaspé 14 12 0 1 1 14 85% 10
Gatineau 4 3 0 1 0 20 75% 8
Geraldton 28 27 1 0 0 15 75% 14
Gore Bay 6 5 0 1 0 26 33% 4
Halifax 49 33 6 10 0 17 80% 20
Hamilton 13 10 0 3 0 27 46% 9
Havre St Pierre 37 12 3 22 0 21 68% 25
Îles de la Madeleine 24 22 0 2 0 17 62% 9
Inukjuak 76 45 1 29 1 13 81% 26
Ivujivik 12 11 0 1 0 14 75% 6
Kapuskasing 36 32 2 2 0 13 89% 12
Kenora 29 20 1 8 0 16 79% 22
Kingston 4 4 0 0 0 35 50% 5
Kuujjuaq 25 20 1 3 1 18 75% 18
Kuujjuarapik 60 32 2 25 1 14 86% 26
La Grande IV 18 8 0 10 0 12 94% 2
La Grande Rivière 36 33 1 2 0 12 83% 18
London 13 7 1 5 0 17 92% 23
Marathon 13 11 0 1 1 23 67% 11
Mary's Harbour 39 21 2 14 2 10 92% 15
Mirabel 10 8 0 2 0 15 70% 20
Moncton 33 29 1 3 0 14 82% 22
Mont-Joli 30 21 4 3 2 28 54% 16
Moosonee 19 14 0 5 0 16 89% 7
Muskoka 16 7 2 7 0 14 81% 8
Nain 11 10 1 0 0 19 64% 5
Natashquan 43 14 4 24 1 20 62% 19
North Bay 26 14 4 8 0 15 77% 10
Ottawa 5 4 0 1 0 12 100% 7
Peterborough 8 4 2 2 0 13 88% 10
Pickle Lake 13 12 0 0 1 13 92% 2
Puvirnituq 77 40 2 34 1 16 80% 30
Quaqtaq 8 5 0 1 2 5 100% 9
Quebec City 26 18 3 5 0 18 69% 21
Red Lake 25 19 2 4 0 14 88% 6
Roberval 11 9 1 1 0 12 82% 8
Sable Island 42 20 1 19 2 17 80% 15
Saint John 34 23 5 5 1 16 73% 14
Sarnia 6 3 0 3 0 16 67% 12
Sault Ste Marie 20 14 1 5 0 17 80% 14
Schefferville 60 24 2 33 1 12 88% 13
Sept-Îles 30 23 3 4 0 15 87% 9
Sherbrooke 15 6 1 8 0 15 93% 13
Sioux Lookout 21 10 3 8 0 16 81% 14
St Anthony 41 26 1 14 0 19 85% 31
St Catharines 2 2 0 0 0 16 50% 5
St Hubert 23 5 0 18 0 12 87% 18
St John's 61 47 7 7 0 18 77% 26
Stephenville 32 28 1 3 0 13 84% 7
Sudbury 20 18 0 2 0 21 80% 10
Sydney 40 35 1 4 0 17 78% 11
Tasiujaq 3 3 0 0 0 19 67% 11
Thunder Bay 13 13 0 0 0 21 85% 18
Timmins 27 23 2 2 0 16 81% 12
Toronto City Centre 17 9 0 8 0 17 65% 22
Toronto LBPI 5 2 2 1 0 6 100% 22
Trois rivieres 35 10 0 25 0 15 74% 12
Val-d'Or 24 17 0 7 0 21 67% 14
Wabush 24 15 0 9 0 18 83% 8
Waskaganish 5 5 0 0 0 34 60% 6
Waterloo/Wellington 17 9 0 6 2 16 80% 6
Wawa 8 6 0 2 0 10 100% 12
Wiarton 10 9 0 1 0 18 60% 5
Windsor 16 13 1 2 0 17 62% 16
Yarmouth 47 37 5 4 1 20 63% 21
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 7 5 1 1 0 12 100% 4
Arctic Bay 10 10 0 0 0 10 90% 2
Arviat 46 32 2 11 1 10 82% 17
Baker Lake 25 24 0 0 1 19 83% 19
Bella Bella 26 10 1 14 1 11 92% 8
Brandon 9 7 1 1 0 16 78% 8
Buffalo Narrows 13 11 0 1 1 13 83% 3
Burwash 12 7 2 2 1 10 91% 6
Calgary Intl 15 12 1 2 0 7 93% 18
Cambridge Bay 34 29 1 4 0 13 88% 22
Campbell River 4 3 1 0 0 17 75% 0
Cape Dorset 69 35 2 24 8 17 79% 27
Castlegar 8 7 1 0 0 9 100% 3
Churchill 53 48 2 3 0 11 92% 12
Clyde River 50 28 2 19 1 13 84% 14
Coral Harbour 22 20 1 1 0 13 82% 19
Cranbrook 13 11 2 0 0 13 92% 1
Deline 6 5 0 1 0 20 83% 4
Dauphin 40 23 2 15 0 9 90% 19
Dawson City 2 2 0 0 0 6 100% 3
Dawson Creek 27 8 0 18 1 10 92% 7
Dease Lake 5 2 0 3 0 12 80% 1
Edmonton Intl 14 8 3 3 0 12 79% 13
Edmonton Villeneuve 28 11 2 13 2 22 73% 12
Estevan 10 10 0 0 0 8 90% 3
Eureka 5 4 1 0 0 15 80% 10
Faro 1 1 0 0 0 13 100% 2
Fort Chipewyan 12 7 0 4 1 8 100% 8
Fort Good Hope 4 4 0 0 0 9 100% 3
Fort McMurray 71 43 5 21 2 14 83% 27
Fort McPherson 1 1 0 0 0 5 100% 5
Fort Nelson 9 7 1 0 1 10 88% 8
Fort Simpson 8 7 0 1 0 7 100% 4
Fort Smith 13 10 1 2 0 15 85% 10
Fort St John 16 13 1 2 0 12 88% 7
Gillam 17 12 1 4 0 19 76% 14
Gjoa Haven 69 44 3 19 3 20 74% 27
Grande Prairie 15 14 0 1 0 12 93% 4
Hall Beach 42 23 2 12 5 14 84% 25
Hay River 9 9 0 0 0 17 78% 10
High Level 30 19 1 9 1 12 86% 12
Holman 4 4 0 0 0 7 100% 6
Igloolik 10 9 0 0 1 8 100% 13
Inuvik 25 22 2 1 0 14 80% 19
Iqaluit 32 26 3 3 0 13 84% 22
Island Lake 23 17 2 2 2 21 71% 9
Kamloops 2 1 0 1 0 21 50% 3
Kelowna 12 8 0 4 0 13 83% 1
Key Lake 8 7 1 0 0 15 88% 4
Kugaaruk 5 4 0 0 1 24 75% 12
Kugluktuk 63 49 3 10 1 17 77% 36
La Ronge 16 15 1 0 0 10 88% 5
Lethbridge 19 15 0 3 1 7 100% 12
Lloydminster 23 18 2 3 0 11 83% 18
Lutselk'e 4 3 0 0 1 4 100% 3
Lynn Lake 29 16 2 11 0 10 90% 7
Mackenzie 13 3 0 9 1 8 92% 2
Masset 12 9 0 3 0 7 100% 3
Mayo 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 3
Medicine Hat 35 25 2 8 0 13 83% 11
Nanaimo 1 1 0 0 0 22 0% 2
Norman Wells 8 7 1 0 0 18 88% 9
North Battleford 26 17 1 8 0 11 85% 9
Norway House 33 18 3 11 1 15 88% 6
Old Crow 7 6 0 1 0 9 100% 2
Pangnirtung 3 3 0 0 0 6 100% 2
Paulatuk 10 9 0 1 0 9 90% 7
Peace River 27 24 1 2 0 12 96% 4
Penticton 1 1 0 0 0 2 100% 5
Pond Inlet 51 19 6 21 5 23 65% 26
Port Hardy 7 4 1 2 0 25 57% 10
Prince Albert 31 27 1 3 0 12 87% 5
Prince George 15 8 1 6 0 14 80% 11
Qikiqtarjuaq 55 38 2 14 1 18 76% 21
Quesnel 6 3 0 3 0 13 67% 4
Rae Lake 3 3 0 0 0 11 67% 0
Rankin Inlet 21 14 3 4 0 20 67% 20
Red Deer 17 13 2 2 0 18 82% 12
Regina 11 6 2 3 0 14 73% 6
Repulse Bay 16 10 2 3 1 10 93% 8
Resolute Bay 34 31 0 3 0 14 85% 19
Sachs Harbour 12 9 0 0 3 7 89% 5
Sandspit 23 10 0 13 0 10 87% 13
Saskatoon 19 18 1 0 0 8 100% 5
Slave Lake 36 13 3 20 0 11 94% 11
Smithers 1 1 0 0 0 6 100% 2
Springbank 13 8 0 5 0 8 92% 11
Stony Rapids 15 7 1 7 0 10 93% 10
Swift Current 31 14 3 14 0 17 77% 16
Taloyoak 20 17 1 1 1 12 95% 23
Terrace 4 4 0 0 0 13 75% 2
Teslin 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0
The Pas 19 16 2 1 0 15 79% 5
Thompson 27 22 0 3 2 20 64% 8
Tofino 6 4 0 1 1 32 80% 7
Tuktoyaktuk 9 8 0 0 1 11 88% 8
Vancouver 7 6 1 0 0 20 86% 8
Victoria 2 2 0 0 0 4 100% 0
Victoria Harbour 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 1
Watson Lake 9 7 0 2 0 21 78% 2
Wekweeti 10 9 0 1 0 10 90% 6
Whitecourt 5 5 0 0 0 5 100% 2
Whitehorse 3 2 0 1 0 15 67% 3
Williams Lake 11 10 1 0 0 9 100% 8
Winnipeg 17 12 3 2 0 10 100% 13
Yellowknife 4 4 0 0 0 6 100% 8
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.