TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: June    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Attawapiskat 9 6 0 3 0 9 100% 11
Baie Comeau 25 18 1 6 0 12 84% 31
Bathurst 36 30 1 5 0 16 78% 23
Big Trout Lake 44 14 5 24 1 13 84% 20
Blanc Sablon 39 31 3 2 3 19 81% 17
Buttonville 29 19 2 8 0 12 90% 32
Cartwright 26 24 2 0 0 18 77% 9
Chapleau 17 13 2 2 0 14 82% 7
Charlottetown 25 22 2 1 0 11 96% 24
Chibougamau-Chapais 19 8 0 11 0 11 89% 13
Churchill Falls 29 15 0 14 0 12 86% 17
Deer Lake 16 14 1 1 0 15 88% 12
Dorval 13 7 2 4 0 16 62% 18
Dryden 29 10 0 19 0 9 90% 31
Earlton 7 6 0 0 1 10 100% 15
Fort Severn 11 5 0 6 0 24 73% 4
Fredericton 32 16 0 16 0 14 81% 32
Gander 49 37 6 6 0 15 80% 19
Gaspé 14 11 1 2 0 24 57% 12
Gatineau 9 7 2 0 0 14 78% 10
Geraldton 21 18 0 3 0 13 81% 21
Gore Bay 20 13 0 7 0 12 85% 11
Halifax 32 27 2 3 0 14 81% 24
Hamilton 21 12 2 7 0 14 71% 28
Havre St Pierre 40 28 1 11 0 13 78% 22
Îles de la Madeleine 15 13 1 1 0 19 73% 7
Inukjuak 36 21 0 15 0 12 92% 11
Kapuskasing 30 22 2 6 0 14 83% 29
Kenora 31 28 1 2 0 12 90% 12
Kingston 12 11 0 0 1 15 91% 14
Kuujjuaq 18 14 2 2 0 19 78% 8
Kuujjuarapik 29 18 1 10 0 19 79% 29
La Grande IV 10 3 0 6 1 16 78% 12
La Grande Rivière 27 25 1 1 0 12 89% 21
London 20 15 1 4 0 10 90% 30
Marathon 5 3 0 1 1 7 100% 9
Mary's Harbour 20 16 0 4 0 16 80% 16
Mirabel 19 17 2 0 0 10 89% 17
Moncton 14 10 2 2 0 14 79% 20
Mont-Joli 11 9 1 1 0 15 82% 13
Moosonee 23 14 0 9 0 14 87% 29
Muskoka 23 10 1 12 0 9 96% 18
Muskrat Dam 24 7 1 15 1 11 87% 5
Nain 11 9 1 1 0 20 82% 14
Natashquan 38 21 2 15 0 18 79% 22
North Bay 34 28 1 5 0 12 82% 20
Ottawa 19 18 1 0 0 11 89% 20
Peterborough 30 15 0 14 1 12 93% 20
Pickle Lake 13 13 0 0 0 16 77% 5
Quebec City 20 18 1 1 0 10 85% 21
Red Lake 22 15 0 4 3 13 79% 13
Roberval 13 13 0 0 0 10 92% 8
Sable Island 29 20 1 8 0 18 83% 14
Saint John 30 25 2 3 0 16 80% 16
Sandy Lake 23 19 0 4 0 11 87% 11
Sarnia 14 9 0 4 1 17 77% 18
Sault Ste Marie 27 20 1 6 0 11 96% 23
Schefferville 63 15 1 47 0 11 86% 16
Sept-Îles 40 34 4 2 0 14 80% 24
Sherbrooke 15 10 0 4 1 7 100% 15
Sioux Lookout 24 18 2 4 0 12 83% 21
St Anthony 41 25 3 13 0 15 83% 20
St Catharines 10 6 0 3 1 16 78% 12
St Hubert 31 10 1 20 0 10 90% 26
St John's 42 33 3 6 0 14 83% 30
Stephenville 31 26 2 3 0 15 71% 19
Sudbury 29 21 3 4 1 16 75% 27
Sydney 37 29 1 7 0 18 70% 24
Tasiujaq 3 3 0 0 0 11 100% 2
Thunder Bay 10 9 0 1 0 12 80% 24
Timmins 14 13 1 0 0 15 79% 30
Toronto City Centre 27 18 2 7 0 15 81% 41
Toronto LBPI 15 11 2 2 0 11 93% 31
Trois rivieres 26 9 2 15 0 9 88% 23
Val-d'Or 21 14 1 6 0 12 95% 15
Wabush 26 18 1 7 0 10 85% 17
Waskaganish 4 4 0 0 0 11 75% 6
Waterloo/Wellington 37 12 3 22 0 11 89% 28
Wawa 5 3 0 2 0 10 100% 7
Wiarton 14 11 1 2 0 22 64% 14
Windsor 14 13 0 1 0 10 100% 23
Yarmouth 25 19 1 5 0 11 80% 20
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 9 7 0 2 0 16 56% 1
Arctic Bay 1 1 0 0 0 2 100% 2
Arviat 35 15 3 16 1 20 76% 16
Baker Lake 13 11 0 1 1 17 83% 10
Bella Bella 20 14 1 5 0 12 80% 5
Brandon 12 10 0 2 0 15 75% 21
Buffalo Narrows 12 9 1 1 1 17 82% 10
Burwash 16 6 2 8 0 10 88% 2
Calgary Intl 13 12 1 0 0 7 100% 23
Cambridge Bay 20 18 0 1 1 13 89% 19
Campbell River 5 5 0 0 0 13 80% 2
Cape Dorset 38 22 2 14 0 18 74% 26
Castlegar 8 7 0 1 0 8 100% 5
Churchill 19 17 1 1 0 10 89% 9
Clyde River 46 25 1 19 1 16 69% 29
Coral Harbour 11 9 1 0 1 14 80% 7
Cranbrook 5 4 1 0 0 13 60% 12
Deline 2 2 0 0 0 10 100% 2
Dauphin 23 15 2 6 0 10 91% 14
Dawson City 4 3 0 1 0 7 100% 3
Dawson Creek 8 2 0 6 0 9 88% 8
Dease Lake 3 1 0 2 0 14 67% 3
Edmonton Intl 14 8 3 3 0 13 86% 16
Edmonton Villeneuve 18 12 1 5 0 12 89% 14
Estevan 5 5 0 0 0 5 100% 3
Eureka 5 4 0 1 0 21 80% 10
Faro 6 3 0 3 0 16 67% 6
Fort Chipewyan 20 6 0 13 1 12 89% 8
Fort Good Hope 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 2
Fort McMurray 24 13 2 9 0 10 92% 14
Fort McPherson 2 2 0 0 0 16 100% 2
Fort Nelson 13 13 0 0 0 10 92% 16
Fort Simpson 14 11 1 2 0 21 86% 12
Fort Smith 10 9 0 1 0 25 70% 10
Fort St John 11 9 0 2 0 14 82% 8
Gillam 29 24 3 0 2 11 89% 11
Gjoa Haven 54 39 2 10 3 16 80% 25
Grande Prairie 14 12 2 0 0 11 93% 9
Hall Beach 21 16 1 3 1 15 85% 18
Hay River 9 6 0 2 1 14 75% 15
High Level 30 24 2 4 0 10 90% 11
Holman 2 1 0 1 0 17 50% 8
Igloolik 7 6 1 0 0 21 86% 11
Inuvik 14 13 1 0 0 9 100% 13
Iqaluit 20 19 0 1 0 10 85% 17
Island Lake 14 11 0 2 1 8 100% 25
Ivujivik 6 5 0 1 0 13 83% 8
Kamloops 2 2 0 0 0 12 100% 4
Kangiqsujuaq 8 6 0 0 2 23 67% 8
Kangirsuk 3 3 0 0 0 11 67% 3
Kelowna 4 0 0 4 0 14 75% 3
Key Lake 15 11 0 3 1 12 93% 6
Kugaaruk 3 3 0 0 0 32 33% 7
Kugluktuk 25 15 3 7 0 20 72% 15
La Ronge 14 10 0 2 2 10 92% 11
Lethbridge 9 6 0 3 0 5 100% 18
Lloydminster 42 34 2 6 0 10 93% 7
Lutselk'e 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 3
Lynn Lake 43 14 3 26 0 13 81% 12
Mackenzie 10 5 0 5 0 10 100% 9
Masset 7 6 0 0 1 12 83% 3
Mayo 7 6 1 0 0 4 100% 5
Medicine Hat 9 9 0 0 0 5 100% 20
Nanaimo 5 5 0 0 0 14 80% 3
Norman Wells 6 5 1 0 0 16 83% 5
North Battleford 23 14 0 9 0 15 83% 20
Norway House 57 24 4 28 1 13 86% 11
Old Crow 3 2 0 1 0 11 100% 3
Pangnirtung 5 3 1 1 0 13 80% 3
Paulatuk 8 6 0 2 0 20 62% 9
Peace River 10 9 1 0 0 9 100% 4
Penticton 1 1 0 0 0 8 100% 3
Pond Inlet 25 7 3 14 1 17 71% 15
Port Hardy 5 5 0 0 0 13 80% 5
Prince Albert 19 15 1 2 1 14 83% 18
Prince George 11 5 3 3 0 11 82% 14
Prince Rupert 35 18 1 16 0 11 91% 5
Puvirnituq 29 18 2 9 0 24 52% 13
Qikiqtarjuaq 44 24 5 13 2 20 69% 18
Quaqtaq 4 4 0 0 0 9 100% 4
Quesnel 5 1 0 4 0 9 100% 3
Rae Lake 3 3 0 0 0 9 100% 4
Rankin Inlet 10 7 0 1 2 21 62% 10
Red Deer 14 11 0 3 0 7 100% 12
Regina 15 14 0 1 0 6 93% 15
Repulse Bay 3 3 0 0 0 10 100% 3
Resolute Bay 46 32 3 9 2 23 70% 28
Sachs Harbour 6 5 0 0 1 12 80% 10
Salluit 7 5 0 1 1 23 67% 5
Sandspit 29 14 0 15 0 20 72% 11
Saskatoon 14 11 1 2 0 12 86% 19
Slave Lake 36 10 5 12 9 22 78% 12
Smithers 2 2 0 0 0 8 100% 0
Springbank 10 8 0 2 0 7 100% 13
Stony Rapids 12 7 0 5 0 9 83% 16
Swift Current 30 18 0 12 0 9 90% 10
Taloyoak 10 7 0 3 0 22 80% 18
Terrace 4 3 1 0 0 9 100% 6
Teslin 1 1 0 0 0 9 100% 0
The Pas 32 22 2 3 5 16 78% 11
Thompson 25 14 4 5 2 21 74% 3
Tofino 12 8 0 4 0 15 75% 6
Tuktoyaktuk 12 8 0 2 2 13 80% 5
Vancouver 5 3 0 2 0 7 100% 5
Victoria 5 3 0 1 1 8 100% 1
Victoria Harbour 8 8 0 0 0 13 75% 0
Watson Lake 8 6 2 0 0 8 100% 8
Wekweeti 12 8 0 4 0 20 75% 9
Whitecourt 9 7 0 2 0 21 67% 1
Whitehorse 3 3 0 0 0 12 100% 7
Williams Lake 3 2 0 1 0 25 67% 5
Winnipeg 20 17 3 0 0 12 90% 33
Yellowknife 16 15 0 1 0 8 88% 7
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.