TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: Jun    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 23 20 0 3 0 10 91% 23
Bathurst 28 23 2 3 0 15 75% 14
Big Trout Lake 63 25 3 35 0 12 79% 21
Blanc Sablon 24 19 2 3 0 18 79% 15
Buttonville 6 5 1 0 0 22 50% 10
Cartwright 27 18 3 6 0 24 63% 9
Chapleau 5 5 0 0 0 10 100% 17
Charlottetown 32 29 0 3 0 14 81% 15
Chibougamau-Chapais 13 8 0 2 3 9 90% 13
Churchill Falls 34 10 0 24 0 8 97% 12
Deer Lake 18 18 0 0 0 17 72% 14
Dorval 6 4 0 2 0 7 100% 22
Dryden 36 19 2 15 0 10 92% 30
Earlton 6 5 0 1 0 8 100% 10
Fredericton 44 24 2 18 0 10 91% 18
Gander 53 39 3 10 1 16 77% 16
Gaspé 29 24 2 2 1 16 86% 23
Gatineau 9 8 0 1 0 11 100% 8
Geraldton 29 22 4 3 0 18 72% 21
Gore Bay 6 3 0 3 0 9 83% 5
Halifax 49 35 4 9 1 14 85% 26
Hamilton 8 7 1 0 0 14 88% 8
Havre St Pierre 52 23 1 28 0 11 88% 12
Îles de la Madeleine 25 22 0 2 1 18 79% 20
Inukjuak 28 19 0 9 0 16 71% 22
Ivujivik 4 3 0 0 1 18 100% 3
Kapuskasing 36 31 2 2 1 16 80% 23
Kenora 23 17 0 6 0 17 74% 27
Kingston 9 7 1 1 0 17 67% 8
Kuujjuaq 16 12 1 3 0 13 75% 15
Kuujjuarapik 33 16 2 15 0 16 79% 27
La Grande IV 11 7 0 4 0 9 100% 15
La Grande Rivière 23 19 2 2 0 15 87% 20
London 13 7 0 6 0 8 92% 11
Marathon 7 5 0 0 2 11 100% 14
Mary's Harbour 25 19 1 5 0 17 76% 15
Mirabel 18 16 0 2 0 10 83% 22
Moncton 22 20 1 1 0 10 91% 21
Mont-Joli 19 17 0 2 0 12 89% 36
Moosonee 10 4 0 6 0 11 100% 21
Muskoka 11 5 1 5 0 9 100% 6
Nain 18 14 1 2 1 20 76% 12
Natashquan 35 19 1 14 1 13 82% 21
North Bay 23 14 0 9 0 16 78% 17
Ottawa 13 10 3 0 0 19 54% 10
Peterborough 5 3 2 0 0 11 80% 10
Pickle Lake 9 8 0 1 0 10 89% 7
Puvirnituq 22 16 1 5 0 23 64% 14
Quaqtaq 12 11 0 0 1 12 73% 8
Quebec City 17 14 2 1 0 12 100% 15
Red Lake 21 15 1 4 1 12 85% 10
Roberval 11 9 0 2 0 10 82% 13
Sable Island 33 17 1 13 2 15 71% 21
Saint John 27 24 1 2 0 17 67% 21
Sarnia 3 2 0 1 0 18 67% 16
Sault Ste Marie 21 16 2 2 1 22 60% 14
Schefferville 60 13 3 43 1 10 90% 19
Sept-Îles 22 18 1 3 0 11 86% 27
Sherbrooke 14 10 0 3 1 14 62% 18
Sioux Lookout 21 18 0 3 0 10 90% 18
St Anthony 52 31 3 18 0 13 88% 26
St Catharines 3 2 0 1 0 15 100% 4
St Hubert 21 11 2 8 0 11 86% 21
St John's 56 49 1 6 0 19 71% 32
Stephenville 32 25 1 4 2 20 67% 8
Sudbury 15 10 1 4 0 21 47% 7
Sydney 50 38 6 6 0 17 74% 22
Tasiujaq 4 4 0 0 0 8 100% 8
Thunder Bay 25 19 2 4 0 12 80% 25
Timmins 15 10 1 4 0 16 87% 23
Toronto City Centre 15 10 0 5 0 11 93% 11
Toronto LBPI 2 2 0 0 0 4 100% 24
Trois rivieres 19 14 0 5 0 12 89% 22
Val-d'Or 22 12 1 9 0 16 86% 23
Wabush 28 17 4 7 0 12 82% 15
Waskaganish 8 7 0 1 0 15 75% 4
Waterloo/Wellington 15 8 1 6 0 15 60% 15
Wawa 8 4 0 4 0 29 62% 16
Wiarton 11 11 0 0 0 14 82% 4
Windsor 6 2 1 2 1 6 100% 19
Yarmouth 44 36 3 3 2 20 69% 14
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 8 2 2 4 0 8 100% 0
Arctic Bay 3 3 0 0 0 4 100% 3
Arviat 34 19 3 12 0 24 53% 33
Baker Lake 25 19 2 4 0 20 76% 14
Bella Bella 54 18 1 34 1 10 91% 6
Brandon 14 11 2 1 0 15 86% 24
Buffalo Narrows 11 7 1 2 1 8 100% 5
Burwash 13 7 0 6 0 16 85% 5
Calgary Intl 10 6 2 2 0 6 100% 19
Cambridge Bay 31 21 6 3 1 24 73% 25
Campbell River 3 3 0 0 0 19 33% 2
Cape Dorset 33 13 1 17 2 17 84% 5
Castlegar 5 3 1 1 0 14 80% 4
Churchill 25 21 1 3 0 13 80% 10
Clyde River 45 24 3 16 2 17 81% 18
Coral Harbour 26 14 3 3 6 15 75% 9
Cranbrook 6 5 1 0 0 9 83% 10
Deline 2 2 0 0 0 6 100% 6
Dauphin 27 12 1 14 0 14 85% 13
Dawson City 4 3 1 0 0 9 75% 1
Dawson Creek 8 3 1 3 1 8 100% 7
Dease Lake 3 2 0 1 0 7 100% 5
Edmonton Intl 21 15 4 2 0 10 95% 16
Edmonton Villeneuve 19 14 1 4 0 9 89% 16
Estevan 12 9 0 3 0 9 100% 10
Eureka 7 7 0 0 0 10 100% 6
Faro 4 3 0 1 0 11 75% 1
Fort Chipewyan 4 1 0 3 0 13 100% 7
Fort Good Hope 5 5 0 0 0 9 100% 5
Fort McMurray 19 9 1 9 0 8 100% 13
Fort McPherson 8 7 1 0 0 20 88% 7
Fort Nelson 17 13 2 2 0 14 76% 10
Fort Simpson 14 12 0 2 0 8 100% 13
Fort Smith 19 17 1 1 0 10 84% 14
Fort St John 11 11 0 0 0 10 91% 9
Gillam 12 11 1 0 0 14 67% 11
Gjoa Haven 40 24 2 14 0 15 78% 13
Grande Prairie 9 8 0 1 0 22 78% 6
Hall Beach 22 13 1 8 0 16 77% 3
Hay River 14 11 1 2 0 11 86% 14
High Level 23 18 0 5 0 9 96% 15
Holman 1 1 0 0 0 14 100% 7
Igloolik 7 6 0 1 0 16 71% 7
Inuvik 21 19 2 0 0 17 90% 11
Iqaluit 13 10 2 0 1 10 100% 12
Island Lake 20 16 4 0 0 22 70% 10
Kamloops 1 1 0 0 0 18 100% 3
Kelowna 10 3 0 7 0 7 100% 5
Key Lake 13 12 0 1 0 14 77% 9
Kugaaruk 2 1 0 1 0 35 50% 9
Kugluktuk 32 24 3 4 1 17 74% 21
La Ronge 22 20 1 1 0 15 82% 11
Lethbridge 8 7 0 1 0 5 100% 10
Lloydminster 21 18 1 2 0 9 90% 3
Lutselk'e 3 2 0 0 1 8 100% 7
Lynn Lake 31 11 1 16 3 13 86% 12
Mackenzie 16 7 0 8 1 17 73% 9
Masset 19 17 0 1 1 19 83% 4
Mayo 8 6 2 0 0 23 75% 3
Medicine Hat 8 4 1 3 0 9 100% 10
Nanaimo 4 1 1 2 0 32 25% 1
Norman Wells 17 15 1 1 0 9 88% 12
North Battleford 10 5 0 5 0 13 80% 12
Norway House 17 11 0 6 0 11 94% 12
Old Crow 9 7 0 1 1 8 100% 4
Pangnirtung 1 1 0 0 0 12 100% 3
Paulatuk 10 9 0 0 1 31 67% 11
Peace River 22 15 2 5 0 21 68% 9
Penticton 9 8 0 1 0 10 78% 5
Pond Inlet 31 9 0 22 0 11 90% 7
Port Hardy 20 13 4 1 2 15 89% 13
Prince Albert 17 14 0 3 0 16 76% 9
Prince George 21 10 0 11 0 11 95% 6
Qikiqtarjuaq 53 17 3 29 4 18 67% 17
Quesnel 11 3 1 7 0 10 100% 7
Rae Lake 1 1 0 0 0 6 100% 7
Rankin Inlet 14 12 1 1 0 16 79% 8
Red Deer 12 9 0 3 0 14 83% 11
Regina 18 14 0 4 0 9 94% 15
Repulse Bay 5 4 1 0 0 7 100% 3
Resolute Bay 65 50 3 11 1 21 67% 30
Sachs Harbour 17 15 0 2 0 8 94% 10
Sandspit 28 16 1 11 0 18 79% 8
Saskatoon 12 9 1 2 0 8 92% 13
Slave Lake 34 16 1 17 0 18 71% 10
Smithers 5 5 0 0 0 11 80% 0
Springbank 4 3 0 1 0 11 75% 12
Stony Rapids 23 17 1 5 0 10 91% 20
Swift Current 28 11 2 15 0 8 96% 15
Taloyoak 20 13 1 5 1 15 84% 14
Terrace 5 5 0 0 0 13 100% 1
Teslin 2 1 0 1 0 10 100% 1
The Pas 17 15 1 1 0 10 82% 12
Thompson 25 22 1 2 0 10 84% 12
Tofino 12 6 0 3 3 19 67% 7
Tuktoyaktuk 15 13 1 1 0 13 87% 11
Vancouver 7 5 0 2 0 6 100% 5
Victoria 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 5
Victoria Harbour 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0
Watson Lake 8 7 0 1 0 14 88% 9
Wekweeti 10 7 0 3 0 9 100% 11
Whitecourt 14 8 1 4 1 13 85% 5
Whitehorse 5 5 0 0 0 10 80% 3
Williams Lake 21 17 3 1 0 10 90% 4
Winnipeg 20 13 3 4 0 8 95% 16
Yellowknife 7 6 0 0 1 9 100% 15
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.