TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: Jul    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 31 23 0 8 0 12 77% 30
Bathurst 37 32 0 3 2 12 86% 25
Big Trout Lake 45 21 0 24 0 9 91% 20
Blanc Sablon 47 35 3 5 4 20 72% 22
Buttonville 14 10 1 3 0 10 86% 17
Cartwright 35 28 2 3 2 16 79% 24
Chapleau 18 16 1 1 0 11 89% 8
Charlottetown 28 21 1 4 2 16 81% 16
Chibougamau-Chapais 5 4 0 1 0 13 80% 15
Churchill Falls 29 13 2 14 0 11 86% 17
Deer Lake 13 10 0 3 0 15 85% 15
Dorval 12 5 2 5 0 9 83% 25
Dryden 34 13 0 21 0 11 88% 24
Earlton 9 4 0 5 0 9 89% 17
Fredericton 35 14 2 19 0 11 91% 25
Gander 48 38 4 4 2 16 83% 29
Gaspé 23 19 1 2 1 16 68% 18
Gatineau 8 6 0 2 0 13 88% 14
Geraldton 26 21 2 3 0 22 73% 18
Gore Bay 13 6 0 5 2 10 82% 5
Halifax 54 43 7 4 0 12 87% 18
Hamilton 13 11 1 1 0 8 92% 13
Havre St Pierre 42 25 1 16 0 18 76% 23
Îles de la Madeleine 8 5 1 2 0 16 88% 7
Inukjuak 44 33 3 8 0 13 89% 19
Ivujivik 2 2 0 0 0 18 50% 7
Kapuskasing 41 32 1 7 1 14 75% 26
Kenora 21 16 2 3 0 12 81% 26
Kingston 3 2 1 0 0 15 100% 2
Kuujjuaq 23 16 2 4 1 14 82% 8
Kuujjuarapik 65 34 6 24 1 18 78% 31
La Grande IV 24 10 0 14 0 10 83% 14
La Grande Rivière 34 28 3 3 0 13 88% 20
London 21 20 0 1 0 8 95% 25
Marathon 3 3 0 0 0 9 100% 8
Mary's Harbour 42 18 2 21 1 14 71% 27
Mirabel 14 9 1 4 0 8 100% 37
Moncton 21 14 3 4 0 11 100% 25
Mont-Joli 19 15 1 3 0 16 79% 17
Moosonee 20 10 0 10 0 12 90% 13
Muskoka 10 3 1 6 0 13 80% 10
Nain 19 13 1 0 5 21 71% 11
Natashquan 51 26 4 21 0 15 80% 32
North Bay 21 19 0 2 0 15 62% 14
Ottawa 12 10 0 2 0 9 92% 19
Peterborough 7 3 0 4 0 8 100% 9
Pickle Lake 12 11 0 1 0 20 83% 9
Puvirnituq 33 15 5 12 1 15 78% 14
Quaqtaq 5 5 0 0 0 13 80% 17
Quebec City 21 15 2 4 0 16 86% 28
Red Lake 6 5 0 1 0 13 100% 9
Roberval 10 8 2 0 0 9 90% 20
Sable Island 27 14 1 8 4 21 65% 12
Saint John 52 47 3 2 0 16 87% 26
Sarnia 15 6 0 9 0 6 100% 10
Sault Ste Marie 27 16 1 10 0 19 74% 28
Schefferville 43 16 2 25 0 12 84% 29
Sept-Îles 28 25 0 3 0 12 79% 29
Sherbrooke 14 9 0 4 1 12 85% 22
Sioux Lookout 25 19 1 5 0 20 68% 14
St Anthony 67 39 5 23 0 15 84% 20
St Catharines 5 5 0 0 0 10 100% 2
St Hubert 24 11 0 13 0 9 96% 30
St John's 72 59 5 7 1 16 76% 35
Stephenville 30 28 0 2 0 13 90% 13
Sudbury 17 15 1 1 0 17 71% 13
Sydney 31 27 3 1 0 13 94% 23
Tasiujaq 3 2 0 0 1 8 100% 6
Thunder Bay 19 14 1 4 0 15 79% 18
Timmins 19 13 3 3 0 10 89% 27
Toronto City Centre 46 14 2 30 0 14 87% 27
Toronto LBPI 8 6 0 2 0 9 88% 16
Trois rivieres 22 12 2 8 0 13 86% 24
Val-d'Or 22 14 2 6 0 10 91% 30
Wabush 36 20 2 14 0 12 86% 20
Waskaganish 3 3 0 0 0 16 100% 5
Waterloo/Wellington 20 8 0 11 1 8 89% 13
Wawa 8 5 1 2 0 11 88% 7
Wiarton 7 5 1 1 0 23 57% 6
Windsor 10 6 1 3 0 21 70% 20
Yarmouth 47 38 3 6 0 15 83% 23
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 10 8 0 2 0 16 80% 8
Arctic Bay 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 6
Arviat 33 20 5 8 0 23 76% 27
Baker Lake 5 4 0 1 0 15 80% 7
Bella Bella 40 21 4 11 4 13 81% 15
Brandon 25 18 1 5 1 12 92% 25
Buffalo Narrows 18 14 2 2 0 10 83% 11
Burwash 24 14 2 7 1 11 96% 7
Calgary Intl 36 27 5 4 0 12 81% 25
Cambridge Bay 11 8 1 1 1 22 80% 17
Campbell River 3 3 0 0 0 8 100% 4
Cape Dorset 50 21 2 23 4 26 57% 17
Castlegar 9 9 0 0 0 5 100% 7
Churchill 34 30 3 1 0 12 88% 21
Clyde River 49 27 5 14 3 17 74% 25
Coral Harbour 16 14 1 1 0 13 75% 7
Cranbrook 18 16 2 0 0 9 89% 10
Deline 2 0 0 2 0 22 50% 4
Dauphin 32 16 1 15 0 8 97% 19
Dawson City 13 9 1 0 3 16 90% 6
Dawson Creek 12 7 1 4 0 7 100% 9
Dease Lake 8 2 0 5 1 13 86% 6
Edmonton Intl 35 25 3 7 0 10 89% 19
Edmonton Villeneuve 27 17 1 9 0 11 89% 15
Estevan 14 11 1 2 0 12 79% 5
Eureka 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 2
Faro 8 8 0 0 0 9 100% 3
Fort Chipewyan 11 4 1 5 1 7 100% 3
Fort Good Hope 2 2 0 0 0 6 100% 2
Fort McMurray 25 20 0 5 0 9 92% 15
Fort McPherson 11 9 1 0 1 15 80% 11
Fort Nelson 22 17 2 3 0 13 86% 14
Fort Simpson 23 20 2 1 0 12 87% 11
Fort Smith 33 26 3 4 0 13 88% 21
Fort St John 8 5 1 2 0 16 62% 12
Gillam 37 33 0 2 2 14 83% 19
Gjoa Haven 37 12 3 22 0 13 76% 14
Grande Prairie 9 4 2 3 0 27 56% 10
Hall Beach 54 24 5 24 1 18 72% 15
Hay River 6 4 0 2 0 19 67% 15
High Level 24 18 0 6 0 11 92% 20
Holman 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 4
Igloolik 7 7 0 0 0 9 100% 9
Inuvik 35 32 0 3 0 11 91% 22
Iqaluit 35 27 4 3 1 14 79% 14
Island Lake 23 20 2 1 0 19 74% 8
Kamloops 14 13 0 1 0 8 100% 7
Kelowna 24 4 2 18 0 10 88% 8
Key Lake 26 16 1 9 0 15 77% 8
Kugaaruk 1 1 0 0 0 0 100% 11
Kugluktuk 24 18 2 3 1 17 78% 12
La Ronge 24 20 2 2 0 12 92% 8
Lethbridge 33 23 4 6 0 11 88% 13
Lloydminster 43 31 2 10 0 14 84% 15
Lutselk'e 7 3 1 2 1 21 67% 2
Lynn Lake 16 4 1 11 0 9 88% 35
Mackenzie 13 2 1 9 1 7 100% 10
Masset 15 10 0 5 0 25 53% 4
Mayo 21 19 0 2 0 9 95% 12
Medicine Hat 25 21 1 3 0 10 88% 12
Nanaimo 4 4 0 0 0 11 75% 0
Norman Wells 18 13 2 2 1 16 76% 14
North Battleford 26 13 2 11 0 10 100% 19
Norway House 12 6 2 4 0 17 83% 2
Old Crow 5 5 0 0 0 15 60% 3
Pangnirtung 2 2 0 0 0 9 100% 5
Paulatuk 9 8 0 1 0 17 78% 2
Peace River 17 14 1 2 0 10 94% 17
Penticton 4 3 1 0 0 7 100% 6
Pond Inlet 23 5 0 18 0 8 91% 6
Port Hardy 23 20 0 3 0 21 65% 13
Prince Albert 20 18 2 0 0 8 85% 17
Prince George 33 19 1 13 0 12 97% 23
Qikiqtarjuaq 28 13 3 12 0 20 71% 14
Quesnel 31 16 0 13 2 11 93% 20
Rae Lake 4 4 0 0 0 15 50% 0
Rankin Inlet 12 10 0 2 0 19 67% 13
Red Deer 35 26 2 7 0 11 86% 27
Regina 24 18 0 6 0 14 88% 21
Repulse Bay 5 4 0 1 0 22 60% 5
Resolute Bay 34 26 3 4 1 19 70% 21
Sachs Harbour 9 8 0 0 1 12 88% 4
Sandspit 35 18 1 16 0 20 63% 9
Saskatoon 16 13 0 3 0 14 88% 19
Slave Lake 29 13 3 10 3 16 88% 17
Smithers 6 3 1 1 1 14 80% 4
Springbank 21 15 0 6 0 7 95% 15
Stony Rapids 27 14 1 11 1 10 88% 13
Swift Current 47 21 1 25 0 20 70% 19
Taloyoak 13 13 0 0 0 12 100% 12
Terrace 4 3 0 1 0 27 75% 6
Teslin 4 4 0 0 0 15 75% 3
The Pas 27 20 2 5 0 11 93% 8
Thompson 38 37 0 0 1 11 95% 11
Tofino 13 8 1 3 1 34 58% 4
Tuktoyaktuk 11 9 0 2 0 14 73% 16
Vancouver 14 11 2 1 0 9 93% 6
Victoria 3 3 0 0 0 15 100% 3
Victoria Harbour 2 2 0 0 0 6 100% 1
Watson Lake 5 4 0 1 0 7 100% 3
Wekweeti 7 6 0 1 0 14 71% 5
Whitecourt 13 10 1 2 0 10 92% 3
Whitehorse 4 4 0 0 0 7 100% 7
Williams Lake 23 18 4 1 0 15 78% 11
Winnipeg 19 14 0 5 0 12 84% 16
Yellowknife 4 4 0 0 0 14 75% 9
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.