TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: January    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 34 20 4 10 0 9 94% 9
Bathurst 21 19 0 2 0 16 76% 13
Big Trout Lake 43 16 4 23 0 11 95% 12
Blanc Sablon 31 26 2 3 0 15 84% 9
Buttonville 44 38 1 5 0 14 75% 19
Cartwright 23 20 1 2 0 18 70% 16
Chapleau 29 26 0 3 0 12 90% 10
Charlottetown 47 34 3 9 1 14 85% 8
Chibougamau-Chapais 17 14 0 2 1 14 75% 10
Churchill Falls 79 37 3 39 0 12 89% 20
Deer Lake 25 21 1 3 0 16 76% 7
Dorval 27 21 2 4 0 17 74% 19
Dryden 61 32 3 26 0 11 85% 24
Earlton 61 24 2 33 2 16 76% 8
Fredericton 34 20 2 12 0 14 88% 8
Gander 59 44 5 10 0 13 86% 12
Gaspé 11 10 0 1 0 14 73% 10
Gatineau 22 17 2 3 0 14 77% 12
Geraldton 34 29 1 4 0 10 91% 22
Gore Bay 44 24 1 17 2 12 83% 12
Halifax 47 40 3 4 0 12 85% 15
Hamilton 48 37 3 8 0 19 65% 20
Havre St Pierre 42 19 3 19 1 10 98% 10
Îles de la Madeleine 13 11 0 2 0 19 69% 12
Inukjuak 68 38 4 26 0 14 84% 30
Ivujivik 21 19 0 2 0 19 81% 8
Kapuskasing 52 47 2 3 0 13 87% 20
Kenora 49 42 3 4 0 13 80% 32
Kingston 15 10 1 4 0 20 47% 10
Kuujjuaq 34 29 1 4 0 12 94% 11
Kuujjuarapik 44 19 0 25 0 15 82% 19
La Grande IV 23 10 1 12 0 14 74% 11
La Grande Rivière 43 41 0 2 0 12 88% 14
London 56 39 5 12 0 16 73% 24
Marathon 16 13 1 2 0 10 88% 1
Mary's Harbour 45 11 4 30 0 11 89% 14
Mirabel 33 28 0 5 0 15 70% 16
Moncton 37 28 5 4 0 12 92% 6
Mont-Joli 35 27 3 5 0 16 69% 15
Moosonee 40 16 1 22 1 13 90% 6
Muskoka 37 22 0 15 0 15 78% 32
Nain 17 15 0 2 0 14 76% 6
Natashquan 41 20 2 19 0 14 83% 14
North Bay 88 59 6 23 0 13 84% 18
Ottawa 40 28 7 5 0 20 70% 19
Peterborough 27 18 0 8 1 12 85% 16
Pickle Lake 19 16 0 3 0 11 84% 6
Puvirnituq 72 35 6 29 2 13 79% 22
Quaqtaq 12 12 0 0 0 11 92% 4
Quebec City 51 43 4 4 0 15 75% 13
Red Lake 20 17 1 2 0 14 80% 15
Roberval 23 17 0 6 0 14 87% 10
Sable Island 25 13 0 12 0 12 92% 16
Saint John 29 22 3 4 0 16 83% 4
Sarnia 21 13 1 7 0 14 86% 17
Sault Ste Marie 68 57 4 7 0 15 76% 29
Schefferville 55 32 2 21 0 14 82% 29
Sept-Îles 30 24 2 4 0 15 83% 13
Sherbrooke 48 22 0 25 1 11 91% 14
Sioux Lookout 41 35 0 6 0 19 80% 11
St Anthony 72 37 4 31 0 13 88% 20
St Catharines 17 14 0 3 0 14 71% 11
St Hubert 61 27 4 30 0 13 87% 21
St John's 57 42 3 10 2 17 76% 25
Stephenville 28 24 2 2 0 14 71% 19
Sudbury 52 46 1 5 0 16 79% 16
Sydney 34 28 2 4 0 14 85% 8
Tasiujaq 7 7 0 0 0 6 100% 7
Thunder Bay 27 22 0 5 0 12 89% 10
Timmins 67 59 2 5 1 14 80% 13
Toronto City Centre 42 25 1 16 0 15 83% 20
Toronto LBPI 28 21 3 4 0 14 82% 21
Trois rivieres 55 32 2 21 0 14 87% 15
Val-d'Or 85 60 2 23 0 13 85% 26
Wabush 58 34 4 20 0 14 86% 11
Waskaganish 5 4 0 0 1 14 75% 1
Waterloo/Wellington 48 18 2 27 1 11 89% 19
Wawa 19 17 1 1 0 14 89% 10
Wiarton 22 13 0 8 1 16 71% 21
Windsor 34 32 1 1 0 12 88% 17
Yarmouth 31 21 3 7 0 16 81% 12
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 25 20 1 4 0 15 84% 13
Arctic Bay 8 7 1 0 0 11 88% 5
Arviat 42 23 3 16 0 12 93% 27
Baker Lake 17 15 1 1 0 10 94% 23
Bella Bella 16 8 1 6 1 12 73% 3
Brandon 42 38 2 2 0 10 88% 13
Buffalo Narrows 23 18 2 2 1 15 68% 7
Burwash 29 20 3 3 3 19 73% 6
Calgary Intl 21 17 1 3 0 17 76% 26
Cambridge Bay 28 26 1 1 0 15 86% 34
Campbell River 24 16 4 4 0 14 92% 13
Cape Dorset 68 43 2 23 0 12 81% 19
Castlegar 23 15 1 5 2 15 71% 5
Churchill 28 26 1 1 0 9 96% 15
Clyde River 40 25 3 12 0 13 88% 17
Coral Harbour 32 31 0 1 0 12 88% 17
Cranbrook 43 38 2 3 0 13 86% 11
Deline 8 8 0 0 0 11 88% 5
Dauphin 40 26 0 14 0 11 90% 18
Dawson City 15 11 3 0 1 10 93% 3
Dawson Creek 29 12 0 15 2 16 81% 7
Dease Lake 13 8 1 4 0 13 85% 3
Edmonton Intl 27 20 6 1 0 10 93% 17
Edmonton Villeneuve 61 42 2 17 0 9 97% 12
Estevan 4 4 0 0 0 9 100% 10
Eureka 4 4 0 0 0 8 100% 1
Faro 3 2 0 0 1 10 100% 2
Fort Chipewyan 21 10 0 11 0 8 95% 6
Fort Good Hope 5 3 0 1 1 19 75% 2
Fort McMurray 51 28 4 18 1 11 88% 8
Fort McPherson 8 6 2 0 0 20 88% 2
Fort Nelson 15 14 1 0 0 16 73% 10
Fort Simpson 37 23 5 2 7 16 70% 11
Fort Smith 52 41 6 3 2 15 80% 25
Fort St John 31 26 5 0 0 12 94% 22
Gillam 28 22 3 3 0 15 79% 19
Gjoa Haven 61 26 4 28 3 24 67% 37
Grande Prairie 48 47 0 1 0 11 90% 17
Hall Beach 57 46 3 8 0 12 89% 32
Hay River 25 23 0 2 0 10 88% 15
High Level 51 34 3 14 0 16 84% 12
Holman 10 7 1 1 1 16 67% 4
Igloolik 14 9 1 4 0 14 71% 7
Inuvik 18 16 1 1 0 13 78% 8
Iqaluit 25 20 3 2 0 12 80% 20
Island Lake 41 36 3 2 0 14 78% 8
Kamloops 15 15 0 0 0 11 93% 10
Kelowna 66 44 3 17 2 16 81% 14
Key Lake 43 29 1 10 3 12 85% 11
Kugaaruk 6 4 0 1 1 23 60% 9
Kugluktuk 22 18 4 0 0 10 91% 11
La Ronge 31 29 1 1 0 10 90% 5
Lethbridge 34 25 1 8 0 9 88% 21
Lloydminster 43 29 4 10 0 15 84% 14
Lutselk'e 1 0 0 1 0 12 100% 4
Lynn Lake 60 36 2 21 1 12 85% 8
Mackenzie 36 19 4 13 0 13 78% 15
Masset 16 12 1 3 0 10 94% 3
Mayo 11 10 1 0 0 12 91% 1
Medicine Hat 23 17 3 3 0 12 78% 31
Nanaimo 20 15 1 2 2 20 67% 11
Norman Wells 13 7 2 4 0 19 69% 9
North Battleford 54 33 1 20 0 15 78% 11
Norway House 68 44 5 19 0 11 88% 8
Old Crow 3 2 0 0 1 16 100% 5
Pangnirtung 3 3 0 0 0 14 100% 2
Paulatuk 10 6 1 2 1 7 100% 8
Peace River 41 32 5 3 1 14 75% 10
Penticton 36 32 3 1 0 12 92% 8
Pond Inlet 36 20 3 13 0 16 86% 14
Port Hardy 6 6 0 0 0 10 100% 7
Prince Albert 26 19 3 4 0 9 92% 10
Prince George 77 33 5 39 0 14 84% 37
Qikiqtarjuaq 13 12 0 1 0 15 69% 14
Quesnel 47 28 0 19 0 12 85% 12
Rae Lake 6 6 0 0 0 12 83% 0
Rankin Inlet 25 22 0 3 0 12 96% 19
Red Deer 26 22 2 2 0 15 85% 14
Regina 31 23 2 6 0 12 84% 12
Repulse Bay 12 10 0 0 2 12 70% 6
Resolute Bay 41 35 4 1 1 11 95% 23
Sachs Harbour 4 3 0 0 1 3 100% 13
Sandspit 69 33 2 34 0 11 90% 10
Saskatoon 30 24 2 4 0 14 80% 15
Slave Lake 47 31 4 12 0 15 79% 7
Smithers 23 18 0 4 1 9 91% 9
Springbank 28 18 2 7 1 14 81% 14
Stony Rapids 61 33 4 24 0 13 85% 18
Swift Current 69 32 9 24 4 20 69% 18
Taloyoak 29 25 1 1 2 13 89% 18
Terrace 53 41 4 8 0 17 70% 18
Teslin 4 3 0 1 0 15 100% 2
The Pas 48 42 1 5 0 14 83% 15
Thompson 29 24 3 2 0 13 90% 5
Tofino 10 6 0 4 0 16 70% 10
Tuktoyaktuk 22 14 4 1 3 14 79% 10
Vancouver 28 23 4 1 0 10 86% 16
Victoria 38 31 2 3 2 18 75% 14
Victoria Harbour 19 17 1 1 0 11 84% 5
Watson Lake 21 20 1 0 0 10 95% 8
Wekweeti 24 16 0 7 1 11 91% 9
Whitecourt 13 10 0 2 1 20 75% 1
Whitehorse 18 17 1 0 0 11 94% 5
Williams Lake 25 22 2 1 0 10 96% 12
Winnipeg 33 31 0 2 0 9 100% 22
Yellowknife 33 25 3 5 0 13 85% 20
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.