TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: February    Year: 2017    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Attawapiskat 21 6 0 13 2 11 84% 9
Baie Comeau 56 27 2 26 1 16 75% 18
Bathurst 17 14 1 1 1 23 75% 8
Big Trout Lake 44 25 3 16 0 12 86% 17
Blanc Sablon 36 31 2 3 0 17 81% 19
Buttonville 22 18 0 4 0 19 59% 15
Cartwright 22 19 2 1 0 22 77% 13
Chapleau 20 15 0 4 1 15 89% 8
Charlottetown 38 31 1 6 0 18 71% 11
Chibougamau-Chapais 51 13 1 37 0 14 80% 13
Churchill Falls 42 16 4 21 1 12 83% 15
Deer Lake 33 27 0 6 0 15 82% 22
Dorval 23 15 4 4 0 17 70% 22
Dryden 32 19 1 12 0 12 94% 17
Earlton 28 16 0 12 0 11 86% 14
Fort Severn 14 11 0 3 0 16 71% 7
Fredericton 54 19 2 32 1 12 98% 19
Gander 71 55 5 11 0 14 83% 20
Gaspé 16 14 1 0 1 20 80% 8
Gatineau 25 19 1 4 1 18 62% 11
Geraldton 20 15 1 4 0 12 90% 9
Gore Bay 30 11 0 19 0 9 97% 8
Halifax 44 28 4 12 0 12 89% 27
Hamilton 30 19 7 4 0 26 53% 12
Havre St Pierre 57 20 1 35 1 11 95% 26
Îles de la Madeleine 25 20 2 3 0 13 76% 14
Inukjuak 43 20 0 21 2 12 90% 16
Ivujivik 5 5 0 0 0 12 80% 5
Kapuskasing 39 30 2 7 0 16 82% 19
Kenora 24 18 2 2 2 18 68% 13
Kingston 13 11 0 2 0 17 92% 11
Kuujjuaq 14 11 1 2 0 16 79% 8
Kuujjuarapik 42 18 3 20 1 19 73% 17
La Grande IV 23 11 1 11 0 13 91% 10
La Grande Rivière 39 33 0 6 0 18 85% 15
London 47 34 3 10 0 20 66% 10
Marathon 13 7 1 4 1 12 92% 4
Mary's Harbour 64 17 3 42 2 15 79% 19
Mirabel 39 28 6 5 0 20 64% 21
Moncton 33 29 1 3 0 14 82% 19
Mont-Joli 38 28 3 7 0 19 74% 18
Moosonee 34 8 1 25 0 16 79% 15
Muskoka 26 13 0 13 0 15 81% 19
Muskrat Dam 26 16 0 9 1 13 84% 4
Nain 12 11 1 0 0 18 67% 10
Natashquan 44 16 3 25 0 21 75% 20
North Bay 54 43 1 10 0 14 87% 30
Ottawa 31 28 3 0 0 14 81% 16
Peterborough 23 12 0 11 0 14 78% 19
Pickle Lake 19 19 0 0 0 14 89% 9
Puvirnituq 33 20 1 12 0 12 82% 16
Quaqtaq 2 2 0 0 0 8 100% 5
Quebec City 41 35 1 5 0 16 78% 17
Red Lake 14 11 1 2 0 18 71% 10
Roberval 12 12 0 0 0 19 67% 7
Sable Island 51 20 2 28 1 15 80% 7
Saint John 32 26 3 3 0 17 81% 11
Sandy Lake 30 20 0 10 0 11 90% 11
Sarnia 16 6 0 10 0 17 69% 12
Sault Ste Marie 59 46 6 7 0 15 80% 32
Schefferville 63 25 5 33 0 16 83% 22
Sept-Îles 34 25 3 6 0 12 94% 15
Sherbrooke 63 32 2 26 3 14 82% 9
Sioux Lookout 20 18 0 2 0 18 65% 11
St Anthony 75 41 5 29 0 16 80% 23
St Catharines 12 6 2 2 2 18 80% 4
St Hubert 35 21 1 13 0 17 71% 13
St John's 58 49 2 7 0 16 79% 25
Stephenville 39 35 2 2 0 16 74% 23
Sudbury 38 33 4 1 0 18 82% 28
Sydney 41 34 1 6 0 15 85% 14
Tasiujaq 4 2 0 2 0 17 75% 4
Thunder Bay 18 17 0 1 0 12 100% 6
Timmins 32 23 2 6 1 19 81% 17
Toronto City Centre 32 14 2 15 1 15 77% 17
Toronto LBPI 19 12 2 5 0 16 74% 24
Trois rivieres 76 25 2 47 2 15 77% 15
Val-d'Or 62 50 3 9 0 15 82% 21
Wabush 40 21 1 18 0 16 68% 19
Waskaganish 10 4 0 4 2 18 88% 3
Waterloo/Wellington 23 16 0 7 0 13 78% 19
Wawa 13 12 0 1 0 17 77% 9
Wiarton 19 12 0 6 1 21 61% 17
Windsor 19 12 0 7 0 25 63% 17
Yarmouth 41 35 1 5 0 14 83% 27
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 48 37 2 9 0 12 83% 18
Arctic Bay 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 4
Arviat 48 19 2 25 2 15 72% 17
Baker Lake 23 20 1 2 0 16 74% 11
Bella Bella 52 32 3 17 0 10 90% 10
Brandon 26 19 3 4 0 16 88% 8
Buffalo Narrows 15 13 0 2 0 14 93% 6
Burwash 16 14 1 1 0 15 88% 3
Calgary Intl 38 30 7 1 0 18 84% 34
Cambridge Bay 24 17 3 1 3 19 62% 20
Campbell River 18 15 1 1 1 21 76% 4
Cape Dorset 53 25 5 18 5 21 67% 21
Castlegar 12 7 2 3 0 22 58% 11
Churchill 32 29 1 2 0 19 78% 20
Clyde River 39 17 7 14 1 16 79% 17
Coral Harbour 13 9 3 1 0 19 54% 9
Cranbrook 33 29 2 2 0 16 79% 8
Deline 19 16 1 2 0 14 79% 2
Dauphin 29 18 4 7 0 14 79% 6
Dawson City 4 4 0 0 0 8 100% 1
Dawson Creek 27 16 0 9 2 12 80% 4
Dease Lake 6 2 0 4 0 9 100% 0
Edmonton Intl 13 10 2 1 0 12 77% 9
Edmonton Villeneuve 37 20 3 14 0 13 86% 11
Estevan 20 17 0 1 2 17 78% 10
Eureka 17 17 0 0 0 13 88% 5
Faro 4 4 0 0 0 4 100% 1
Fort Chipewyan 33 15 2 15 1 13 81% 2
Fort Good Hope 14 10 0 2 2 15 75% 11
Fort McMurray 42 23 2 17 0 14 83% 9
Fort McPherson 3 3 0 0 0 13 67% 1
Fort Nelson 14 11 2 1 0 19 79% 2
Fort Simpson 9 8 0 1 0 8 100% 4
Fort Smith 29 21 1 7 0 15 83% 15
Fort St John 23 19 2 2 0 14 87% 6
Gillam 22 16 2 2 2 21 75% 6
Gjoa Haven 38 22 3 13 0 18 71% 28
Grande Prairie 14 11 0 1 2 17 83% 16
Hall Beach 57 34 6 16 1 22 71% 31
Hay River 32 24 2 6 0 24 56% 15
High Level 26 18 2 6 0 8 88% 8
Holman 28 13 2 4 9 26 63% 7
Igloolik 9 6 1 1 1 12 88% 7
Inuvik 41 29 3 5 4 22 73% 18
Iqaluit 17 13 2 2 0 12 76% 14
Island Lake 10 8 1 1 0 16 80% 7
Kamloops 15 13 1 1 0 12 87% 6
Kelowna 47 28 3 16 0 21 66% 10
Key Lake 23 20 0 3 0 15 78% 6
Kugaaruk 5 4 0 0 1 8 100% 6
Kugluktuk 28 19 3 4 2 27 58% 16
La Ronge 20 18 0 2 0 15 85% 2
Lethbridge 39 28 1 10 0 18 62% 19
Lloydminster 32 24 0 8 0 16 69% 9
Lutselk'e 1 1 0 0 0 5 100% 5
Lynn Lake 54 26 3 24 1 13 89% 9
Mackenzie 26 11 1 10 4 13 77% 5
Masset 17 10 1 6 0 16 71% 2
Mayo 10 8 0 1 1 24 89% 3
Medicine Hat 27 20 1 6 0 14 74% 17
Nanaimo 14 11 0 3 0 17 71% 6
Norman Wells 19 17 0 1 1 9 94% 8
North Battleford 26 14 3 9 0 17 77% 9
Norway House 13 8 0 5 0 8 92% 3
Old Crow 9 8 1 0 0 13 78% 8
Pangnirtung 3 3 0 0 0 6 100% 1
Paulatuk 13 11 0 0 2 11 73% 8
Peace River 27 23 1 3 0 10 93% 10
Penticton 20 15 1 3 1 17 68% 10
Pond Inlet 34 9 0 25 0 10 97% 15
Port Hardy 18 10 3 3 2 19 75% 6
Prince Albert 17 15 0 2 0 9 100% 2
Prince George 53 28 2 21 2 16 86% 20
Qikiqtarjuaq 24 15 1 7 1 8 96% 25
Quesnel 32 24 1 7 0 22 66% 14
Rae Lake 5 5 0 0 0 8 80% 3
Rankin Inlet 18 15 1 2 0 14 89% 11
Red Deer 31 24 4 2 1 15 77% 5
Regina 29 23 0 6 0 13 90% 24
Repulse Bay 6 4 0 0 2 10 100% 14
Resolute Bay 31 27 1 3 0 13 84% 22
Sachs Harbour 10 7 0 2 1 31 67% 10
Sandspit 32 12 1 18 1 12 84% 7
Saskatoon 20 14 1 5 0 12 85% 12
Slave Lake 37 21 5 10 1 15 83% 4
Smithers 7 4 0 1 2 11 100% 4
Springbank 30 24 1 5 0 12 87% 10
Stony Rapids 49 29 0 20 0 10 92% 17
Swift Current 39 13 3 22 1 20 63% 15
Taloyoak 11 10 1 0 0 16 73% 18
Terrace 16 10 3 2 1 23 73% 8
Teslin 1 1 0 0 0 6 100% 1
The Pas 22 21 0 1 0 10 95% 7
Thompson 23 19 0 4 0 15 87% 8
Tofino 6 5 0 0 1 9 100% 3
Tuktoyaktuk 19 16 1 2 0 13 79% 8
Vancouver 36 29 1 6 0 13 83% 20
Victoria 37 28 3 6 0 23 68% 9
Victoria Harbour 22 13 2 5 2 19 75% 6
Watson Lake 5 5 0 0 0 6 100% 3
Wekweeti 29 16 1 12 0 10 86% 7
Whitecourt 5 5 0 0 0 13 80% 2
Whitehorse 2 1 0 1 0 15 100% 4
Williams Lake 32 27 2 3 0 11 88% 7
Winnipeg 18 15 0 3 0 17 78% 20
Yellowknife 34 29 1 4 0 15 85% 19
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.