TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: December    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Attawapiskat 34 12 0 22 0 15 82% 4
Baie Comeau 82 47 3 32 0 13 80% 23
Bathurst 32 25 1 6 0 16 81% 10
Big Trout Lake 57 29 4 22 2 17 71% 19
Blanc Sablon 32 27 2 3 0 16 84% 10
Buttonville 47 34 3 10 0 23 74% 27
Cartwright 23 19 0 3 1 19 82% 18
Chapleau 25 24 0 1 0 16 72% 6
Charlottetown 49 41 3 5 0 19 73% 25
Chibougamau-Chapais 59 21 2 32 4 13 85% 13
Churchill Falls 41 20 3 18 0 16 73% 10
Deer Lake 44 33 4 7 0 17 80% 15
Dorval 43 26 6 11 0 15 72% 20
Dryden 80 46 4 29 1 14 84% 23
Earlton 33 19 2 11 1 14 72% 8
Fort Severn 21 12 1 7 1 15 95% 4
Fredericton 58 26 3 28 1 15 86% 22
Gander 68 46 3 19 0 12 91% 18
Gaspé 31 28 1 2 0 15 81% 19
Gatineau 19 11 2 6 0 24 74% 4
Geraldton 65 58 5 2 0 14 75% 19
Gore Bay 22 11 1 9 1 18 76% 7
Halifax 58 46 5 7 0 14 86% 25
Hamilton 41 31 4 6 0 20 73% 20
Havre St Pierre 58 26 4 26 2 13 91% 17
Îles de la Madeleine 27 19 1 6 1 18 77% 16
Inukjuak 47 19 2 26 0 15 79% 28
Ivujivik 11 10 0 0 1 12 90% 8
Kapuskasing 72 59 6 6 1 14 82% 23
Kenora 56 46 4 6 0 18 68% 20
Kingston 21 15 1 5 0 21 67% 15
Kuujjuaq 21 18 0 3 0 15 81% 12
Kuujjuarapik 31 12 3 15 1 15 83% 10
La Grande IV 32 20 2 10 0 13 88% 4
La Grande Rivière 42 33 3 6 0 15 83% 19
London 56 42 1 13 0 20 70% 23
Marathon 16 11 1 3 1 14 93% 10
Mary's Harbour 40 12 1 27 0 16 75% 13
Mirabel 50 39 1 10 0 20 72% 25
Moncton 72 58 2 12 0 15 78% 23
Mont-Joli 51 42 3 5 1 15 78% 14
Moosonee 33 15 1 16 1 14 81% 9
Muskoka 53 13 1 39 0 11 91% 17
Muskrat Dam 31 19 0 12 0 11 94% 15
Nain 1 1 0 0 0 8 100% 8
Natashquan 47 22 1 23 1 12 89% 28
North Bay 90 54 8 27 1 14 83% 19
Ottawa 41 29 4 8 0 17 83% 10
Peterborough 40 28 1 10 1 11 92% 11
Pickle Lake 19 15 0 3 1 14 89% 10
Puvirnituq 46 16 3 27 0 15 80% 40
Quaqtaq 3 3 0 0 0 13 100% 12
Quebec City 64 44 3 17 0 17 69% 27
Red Lake 30 24 1 5 0 14 87% 6
Roberval 29 28 0 1 0 15 76% 12
Sable Island 36 18 2 16 0 11 94% 12
Saint John 36 27 1 8 0 16 81% 17
Sandy Lake 35 18 2 14 1 13 85% 15
Sarnia 15 10 0 5 0 19 60% 5
Sault Ste Marie 48 33 3 12 0 17 73% 33
Schefferville 66 30 1 35 0 12 83% 17
Sept-Îles 43 30 3 10 0 18 81% 12
Sherbrooke 69 29 2 34 4 17 71% 19
Sioux Lookout 68 57 2 9 0 16 81% 15
St Anthony 68 29 3 36 0 15 79% 28
St Catharines 15 14 0 0 1 14 86% 1
St Hubert 77 32 6 39 0 17 79% 33
St John's 54 38 5 11 0 16 76% 29
Stephenville 39 30 1 8 0 16 85% 25
Sudbury 39 31 1 7 0 15 82% 12
Sydney 64 46 1 17 0 20 73% 23
Tasiujaq 7 6 0 0 1 24 50% 7
Thunder Bay 41 30 6 5 0 17 78% 12
Timmins 44 37 1 6 0 14 84% 19
Toronto City Centre 54 29 4 20 1 13 74% 22
Toronto LBPI 42 28 4 10 0 14 83% 18
Trois rivieres 78 36 4 37 1 16 82% 22
Val-d'Or 81 55 4 22 0 15 80% 23
Wabush 52 30 4 18 0 20 75% 16
Waskaganish 8 7 0 1 0 16 88% 3
Waterloo/Wellington 51 28 2 21 0 17 67% 19
Wawa 17 13 0 2 2 15 93% 5
Wiarton 24 19 0 5 0 17 79% 9
Windsor 34 24 1 9 0 17 74% 18
Yarmouth 56 36 7 13 0 17 82% 21
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 36 24 3 9 0 17 61% 17
Arctic Bay 2 2 0 0 0 7 100% 0
Arviat 35 22 2 9 2 14 82% 26
Baker Lake 28 25 2 1 0 10 93% 22
Bella Bella 17 4 1 12 0 7 94% 10
Brandon 26 19 1 5 1 14 84% 16
Buffalo Narrows 19 14 1 1 3 15 81% 8
Burwash 35 22 3 8 2 19 82% 3
Calgary Intl 19 14 3 0 2 15 82% 19
Cambridge Bay 37 34 0 2 1 15 81% 13
Campbell River 16 12 1 2 1 23 67% 11
Cape Dorset 38 27 2 5 4 11 85% 33
Castlegar 12 8 1 3 0 28 75% 2
Churchill 33 26 2 5 0 14 88% 15
Clyde River 47 23 5 19 0 19 72% 17
Coral Harbour 28 23 1 4 0 16 71% 15
Cranbrook 29 24 5 0 0 16 66% 5
Deline 9 8 0 1 0 9 100% 7
Dauphin 55 38 1 15 1 20 70% 13
Dawson City 10 9 0 0 1 10 89% 3
Dawson Creek 43 21 0 21 1 11 95% 9
Dease Lake 21 14 3 4 0 11 95% 3
Edmonton Intl 24 16 5 3 0 15 79% 12
Edmonton Villeneuve 35 19 3 8 5 12 87% 11
Estevan 11 8 1 2 0 14 73% 12
Eureka 12 12 0 0 0 6 100% 15
Faro 5 3 1 1 0 15 80% 3
Fort Chipewyan 30 15 2 13 0 11 90% 2
Fort Good Hope 3 3 0 0 0 14 67% 5
Fort McMurray 64 30 2 32 0 12 91% 8
Fort McPherson 6 4 0 1 1 12 80% 4
Fort Nelson 14 13 1 0 0 10 86% 2
Fort Simpson 35 29 2 3 1 11 91% 10
Fort Smith 40 32 3 2 3 13 81% 11
Fort St John 19 18 0 1 0 17 74% 6
Gillam 20 17 0 2 1 13 84% 8
Gjoa Haven 56 24 4 20 8 22 67% 37
Grande Prairie 18 15 1 2 0 19 78% 7
Hall Beach 48 32 5 10 1 14 77% 26
Hay River 31 27 1 3 0 16 87% 12
High Level 25 19 2 4 0 12 84% 11
Holman 15 9 0 1 5 21 70% 4
Igloolik 8 4 0 2 2 43 33% 6
Inuvik 22 20 1 1 0 9 91% 5
Iqaluit 36 32 2 2 0 11 97% 21
Island Lake 15 11 2 0 2 24 69% 19
Kamloops 27 27 0 0 0 14 81% 9
Kelowna 39 26 4 9 0 16 85% 10
Key Lake 30 18 2 9 1 20 69% 6
Kugaaruk 4 3 0 1 0 23 75% 9
Kugluktuk 31 24 3 3 1 25 67% 23
La Ronge 23 18 2 3 0 23 65% 3
Lethbridge 24 14 2 8 0 20 75% 10
Lloydminster 40 21 3 16 0 14 82% 8
Lutselk'e 3 1 1 1 0 34 33% 11
Lynn Lake 70 33 3 31 3 19 73% 4
Mackenzie 49 23 0 23 3 15 85% 9
Masset 8 4 0 3 1 36 57% 2
Mayo 17 14 1 1 1 17 88% 9
Medicine Hat 32 16 1 14 1 16 87% 11
Nanaimo 16 14 1 1 0 16 81% 11
Norman Wells 27 21 2 3 1 21 81% 9
North Battleford 32 15 3 13 1 12 90% 7
Norway House 41 23 1 17 0 13 90% 10
Old Crow 9 8 1 0 0 16 78% 9
Pangnirtung 3 2 0 1 0 14 67% 5
Paulatuk 8 7 0 0 1 7 86% 8
Peace River 28 22 4 2 0 22 57% 11
Penticton 22 20 0 2 0 12 91% 13
Pond Inlet 32 23 1 8 0 13 91% 19
Port Hardy 21 18 1 2 0 13 86% 7
Prince Albert 19 16 1 2 0 18 74% 5
Prince George 74 32 6 36 0 13 82% 28
Qikiqtarjuaq 26 22 1 3 0 8 96% 27
Quesnel 34 23 0 10 1 13 88% 13
Rae Lake 10 9 1 0 0 7 100% 5
Rankin Inlet 23 20 1 2 0 10 91% 15
Red Deer 24 19 3 2 0 14 92% 10
Regina 33 26 1 6 0 14 85% 23
Repulse Bay 9 8 0 0 1 12 75% 11
Resolute Bay 42 38 1 3 0 20 74% 28
Sachs Harbour 7 6 1 0 0 10 86% 10
Sandspit 45 14 2 29 0 13 80% 12
Saskatoon 16 15 0 1 0 11 88% 10
Slave Lake 57 28 5 24 0 20 70% 15
Smithers 16 16 0 0 0 11 94% 8
Springbank 27 19 0 8 0 13 93% 11
Stony Rapids 50 28 0 22 0 10 90% 22
Swift Current 43 24 3 16 0 19 74% 17
Taloyoak 8 6 2 0 0 15 62% 19
Terrace 53 37 6 7 3 19 76% 18
Teslin 6 5 0 1 0 19 67% 0
The Pas 38 27 1 8 2 27 61% 8
Thompson 25 21 2 2 0 13 80% 7
Tofino 6 4 0 2 0 16 67% 2
Tuktoyaktuk 13 9 0 4 0 30 69% 13
Vancouver 37 31 1 5 0 10 97% 17
Victoria 37 31 0 6 0 17 84% 7
Victoria Harbour 16 16 0 0 0 12 88% 2
Watson Lake 4 4 0 0 0 12 75% 2
Wekweeti 34 21 0 12 1 14 91% 11
Whitecourt 16 11 0 3 2 19 64% 2
Whitehorse 31 26 1 2 2 13 86% 16
Williams Lake 38 32 1 3 2 16 83% 15
Winnipeg 37 31 2 4 0 16 78% 13
Yellowknife 34 31 2 0 1 12 79% 10
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.