TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: August    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 30 16 3 11 0 14 90% 17
Bathurst 35 21 3 11 0 14 83% 18
Big Trout Lake 49 14 2 32 1 12 79% 13
Blanc Sablon 55 44 7 2 2 19 75% 31
Buttonville 11 9 0 2 0 15 82% 18
Cartwright 22 21 1 0 0 14 73% 11
Chapleau 11 9 0 2 0 15 91% 5
Charlottetown 19 16 0 3 0 17 79% 11
Chibougamau-Chapais 12 12 0 0 0 10 100% 13
Churchill Falls 19 8 0 11 0 7 95% 15
Deer Lake 10 9 0 1 0 15 60% 9
Dorval 16 9 1 6 0 12 88% 16
Dryden 34 20 0 13 1 14 79% 27
Earlton 12 7 0 5 0 10 92% 7
Fredericton 71 29 3 39 0 13 86% 18
Gander 32 28 2 2 0 17 72% 14
Gaspé 10 7 0 3 0 18 60% 18
Gatineau 10 6 0 3 1 21 56% 9
Geraldton 29 27 0 2 0 11 90% 26
Gore Bay 16 7 0 9 0 8 88% 10
Halifax 30 24 4 2 0 13 80% 17
Hamilton 28 27 0 1 0 11 89% 12
Havre St Pierre 39 24 1 14 0 16 64% 11
Îles de la Madeleine 14 14 0 0 0 14 79% 14
Inukjuak 59 33 4 21 1 15 84% 21
Ivujivik 3 2 0 0 1 12 100% 2
Kapuskasing 24 21 1 2 0 11 92% 20
Kenora 17 12 2 3 0 11 94% 29
Kingston 11 7 2 2 0 15 82% 6
Kuujjuaq 16 10 2 4 0 9 94% 12
Kuujjuarapik 56 24 4 24 4 19 75% 26
La Grande IV 15 8 0 7 0 12 80% 8
La Grande Rivière 23 17 1 5 0 16 70% 22
London 36 30 0 6 0 10 89% 25
Marathon 18 13 0 4 1 18 76% 7
Mary's Harbour 23 12 2 9 0 18 78% 9
Mirabel 17 14 0 3 0 14 82% 22
Moncton 23 19 2 2 0 13 83% 18
Mont-Joli 17 11 2 4 0 13 94% 19
Moosonee 23 16 0 7 0 16 83% 11
Muskoka 12 3 1 7 1 8 91% 10
Nain 17 12 2 0 3 21 79% 11
Natashquan 43 28 2 12 1 19 79% 18
North Bay 30 16 2 10 2 18 64% 17
Ottawa 14 8 2 4 0 10 93% 9
Peterborough 9 6 0 3 0 12 78% 11
Pickle Lake 11 10 0 1 0 10 91% 12
Puvirnituq 46 22 0 22 2 10 89% 20
Quaqtaq 6 4 0 1 1 12 100% 5
Quebec City 17 12 1 4 0 14 76% 17
Red Lake 18 15 1 2 0 20 83% 23
Roberval 18 10 1 5 2 25 69% 8
Sable Island 21 10 1 8 2 18 68% 8
Saint John 49 44 2 3 0 19 67% 20
Sarnia 23 9 0 14 0 6 100% 13
Sault Ste Marie 23 18 2 3 0 18 65% 22
Schefferville 34 7 1 24 2 15 88% 26
Sept-Îles 23 17 3 3 0 22 57% 13
Sherbrooke 19 10 0 9 0 12 79% 8
Sioux Lookout 19 13 1 5 0 16 79% 26
St Anthony 35 26 0 9 0 13 83% 25
St Catharines 11 9 0 2 0 6 100% 2
St Hubert 46 11 1 34 0 8 98% 18
St John's 33 29 2 2 0 12 88% 23
Stephenville 32 29 2 1 0 12 84% 15
Sudbury 32 27 2 3 0 14 81% 21
Sydney 27 24 1 2 0 15 81% 12
Tasiujaq 4 3 0 0 1 8 100% 1
Thunder Bay 9 9 0 0 0 13 78% 16
Timmins 23 20 1 1 1 15 82% 18
Toronto City Centre 30 10 2 18 0 9 93% 20
Toronto LBPI 6 4 0 2 0 8 100% 26
Trois rivieres 17 10 1 5 1 12 81% 11
Val-d'Or 25 19 1 5 0 14 84% 17
Wabush 13 9 1 3 0 10 92% 9
Waskaganish 1 1 0 0 0 18 100% 6
Waterloo/Wellington 37 12 1 23 1 10 92% 20
Wawa 14 12 0 1 1 9 100% 7
Wiarton 17 14 0 3 0 15 82% 3
Windsor 22 18 1 3 0 10 86% 13
Yarmouth 37 27 2 8 0 17 70% 21
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 8 6 0 2 0 9 100% 6
Arctic Bay 1 1 0 0 0 1 100% 3
Arviat 49 23 8 14 4 15 80% 24
Baker Lake 12 11 0 1 0 9 83% 20
Bella Bella 41 25 1 15 0 14 80% 11
Brandon 16 12 0 4 0 11 81% 15
Buffalo Narrows 7 7 0 0 0 7 100% 1
Burwash 11 5 1 5 0 10 91% 3
Calgary Intl 15 10 2 3 0 8 93% 28
Cambridge Bay 23 16 4 3 0 17 70% 20
Campbell River 8 8 0 0 0 9 88% 5
Cape Dorset 33 16 2 14 1 19 78% 32
Castlegar 2 1 1 0 0 4 100% 7
Churchill 31 21 4 5 1 18 73% 12
Clyde River 58 29 9 18 2 22 70% 24
Coral Harbour 29 22 2 2 3 13 85% 14
Cranbrook 9 8 1 0 0 8 100% 2
Deline 8 5 0 2 1 14 86% 3
Dauphin 19 11 1 7 0 10 95% 29
Dawson City 11 10 1 0 0 5 100% 4
Dawson Creek 26 16 0 9 1 10 92% 11
Dease Lake 11 5 2 4 0 31 64% 2
Edmonton Intl 26 20 2 4 0 11 88% 21
Edmonton Villeneuve 24 15 0 9 0 10 92% 18
Estevan 10 10 0 0 0 10 100% 4
Eureka 8 5 0 2 1 34 71% 10
Faro 1 1 0 0 0 8 100% 3
Fort Chipewyan 14 6 0 8 0 14 86% 3
Fort Good Hope 5 4 0 1 0 17 60% 4
Fort McMurray 8 4 0 4 0 8 100% 6
Fort McPherson 9 7 0 1 1 14 62% 3
Fort Nelson 21 15 0 5 1 15 75% 13
Fort Simpson 15 14 1 0 0 12 87% 12
Fort Smith 26 21 3 1 1 13 92% 16
Fort St John 30 26 1 2 1 10 90% 18
Gillam 12 10 0 2 0 15 83% 10
Gjoa Haven 27 17 1 9 0 17 78% 24
Grande Prairie 20 18 2 0 0 13 80% 11
Hall Beach 40 29 3 8 0 17 80% 19
Hay River 12 10 0 2 0 18 83% 16
High Level 25 14 0 11 0 9 96% 13
Holman 4 2 1 1 0 30 75% 2
Igloolik 5 3 1 1 0 22 60% 13
Inuvik 29 20 3 5 1 15 82% 12
Iqaluit 22 16 2 4 0 21 73% 16
Island Lake 32 24 3 4 1 16 71% 12
Kamloops 5 5 0 0 0 8 100% 8
Kelowna 14 2 0 12 0 12 86% 5
Key Lake 13 8 1 4 0 11 85% 4
Kugaaruk 6 6 0 0 0 11 83% 13
Kugluktuk 20 14 1 5 0 25 70% 23
La Ronge 21 15 2 4 0 23 76% 6
Lethbridge 9 6 1 2 0 11 89% 13
Lloydminster 30 26 0 4 0 8 97% 6
Lutselk'e 4 4 0 0 0 10 100% 4
Lynn Lake 3 2 0 1 0 7 100% 40
Mackenzie 9 4 0 5 0 14 78% 2
Masset 27 20 2 3 2 12 88% 7
Mayo 16 14 0 2 0 12 88% 3
Medicine Hat 11 9 0 2 0 9 82% 12
Nanaimo 4 2 1 1 0 35 75% 3
Norman Wells 9 8 0 1 0 12 89% 11
North Battleford 13 8 0 5 0 15 85% 28
Norway House 29 13 0 16 0 10 93% 14
Old Crow 6 5 0 0 1 14 80% 6
Pangnirtung 3 3 0 0 0 12 67% 10
Paulatuk 9 9 0 0 0 10 78% 5
Peace River 23 19 2 2 0 12 87% 15
Penticton 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 2
Pond Inlet 19 13 1 5 0 11 89% 14
Port Hardy 18 15 1 2 0 16 56% 20
Prince Albert 26 22 2 2 0 16 81% 10
Prince George 21 9 0 12 0 13 76% 17
Qikiqtarjuaq 47 33 3 9 2 16 82% 17
Quesnel 28 7 1 20 0 12 86% 17
Rae Lake 2 1 0 1 0 24 50% 2
Rankin Inlet 17 13 1 3 0 22 59% 18
Red Deer 23 20 1 2 0 10 91% 14
Regina 18 14 1 3 0 11 89% 25
Repulse Bay 10 7 0 2 1 12 89% 6
Resolute Bay 59 43 7 7 2 20 74% 32
Sachs Harbour 11 9 1 0 1 11 80% 11
Sandspit 30 14 0 16 0 14 83% 11
Saskatoon 22 21 0 1 0 13 77% 16
Slave Lake 36 12 1 22 1 11 94% 16
Smithers 8 6 0 1 1 16 86% 3
Springbank 14 5 1 8 0 10 86% 18
Stony Rapids 23 12 2 9 0 18 87% 28
Swift Current 41 16 3 21 1 15 82% 18
Taloyoak 9 5 0 3 1 34 62% 14
Terrace 6 5 1 0 0 10 83% 5
Teslin 2 2 0 0 0 12 100% 1
The Pas 22 18 3 1 0 12 77% 16
Thompson 23 21 1 1 0 8 96% 13
Tofino 7 3 0 4 0 33 43% 13
Tuktoyaktuk 12 10 0 2 0 14 67% 14
Vancouver 14 11 2 1 0 8 100% 5
Victoria 5 3 0 2 0 11 80% 1
Victoria Harbour 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 1
Watson Lake 6 6 0 0 0 7 100% 3
Wekweeti 8 3 0 5 0 9 100% 6
Whitecourt 11 10 0 1 0 10 91% 2
Whitehorse 5 4 1 0 0 29 80% 4
Williams Lake 19 16 1 2 0 9 89% 5
Winnipeg 15 12 2 1 0 15 67% 19
Yellowknife 8 8 0 0 0 8 100% 11
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.