TAF Amendment Response Time
Scenariot: NC_CRITERIA    Month: April    Year: 2016    Target: ≥ 90%
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/East (Montreal)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Baie Comeau 44 23 2 19 0 12 86% 9
Bathurst 18 16 0 2 0 17 83% 7
Big Trout Lake 35 17 1 17 0 14 83% 8
Blanc Sablon 53 43 7 2 1 14 77% 21
Buttonville 34 27 2 5 0 17 74% 10
Cartwright 35 33 0 2 0 18 80% 16
Chapleau 10 8 0 2 0 15 90% 2
Charlottetown 28 20 2 5 1 17 70% 12
Chibougamau-Chapais 14 13 1 0 0 18 64% 2
Churchill Falls 51 23 5 23 0 19 69% 18
Deer Lake 35 31 2 2 0 14 77% 19
Dorval 18 12 3 3 0 12 83% 11
Dryden 38 18 2 18 0 13 87% 19
Earlton 41 16 1 24 0 18 76% 9
Fredericton 25 13 1 11 0 10 96% 6
Gander 74 46 7 20 1 21 64% 25
Gaspé 17 13 1 3 0 18 82% 9
Gatineau 9 7 1 1 0 13 89% 4
Geraldton 29 23 3 3 0 17 72% 17
Gore Bay 26 15 0 10 1 18 72% 2
Halifax 33 29 3 1 0 12 97% 21
Hamilton 32 27 0 5 0 16 75% 20
Havre St Pierre 47 27 3 17 0 14 77% 26
Îles de la Madeleine 25 22 1 1 1 12 92% 22
Inukjuak 59 28 3 28 0 14 86% 28
Ivujivik 8 6 0 0 2 24 67% 5
Kapuskasing 39 32 3 4 0 20 77% 15
Kenora 26 23 1 2 0 12 92% 13
Kingston 11 8 0 3 0 23 73% 3
Kuujjuaq 37 26 2 9 0 12 84% 14
Kuujjuarapik 40 14 2 24 0 11 90% 18
La Grande IV 25 8 0 17 0 14 88% 7
La Grande Rivière 29 25 3 1 0 14 83% 15
London 40 29 2 9 0 14 78% 13
Marathon 10 9 0 1 0 11 100% 3
Mary's Harbour 38 22 1 12 3 27 63% 18
Mirabel 19 14 2 3 0 17 68% 11
Moncton 19 14 0 5 0 11 84% 7
Mont-Joli 14 12 1 1 0 16 71% 4
Moosonee 22 12 0 9 1 12 86% 12
Muskoka 42 18 2 21 1 11 93% 8
Nain 16 13 0 2 1 18 73% 10
Natashquan 54 24 2 27 1 15 75% 21
North Bay 26 17 2 7 0 14 88% 13
Ottawa 21 14 3 4 0 15 67% 7
Peterborough 20 8 0 12 0 15 80% 8
Pickle Lake 9 9 0 0 0 14 89% 10
Puvirnituq 69 38 2 27 2 14 79% 27
Quaqtaq 11 9 0 0 2 14 78% 8
Quebec City 20 15 1 4 0 16 65% 10
Red Lake 12 9 1 1 1 11 91% 6
Roberval 12 12 0 0 0 20 75% 5
Sable Island 18 11 2 5 0 20 78% 14
Saint John 26 25 1 0 0 12 92% 9
Sarnia 18 8 0 9 1 11 88% 8
Sault Ste Marie 40 33 2 4 1 16 72% 10
Schefferville 70 34 2 34 0 16 74% 11
Sept-Îles 28 25 1 2 0 11 86% 12
Sherbrooke 13 6 1 6 0 11 92% 12
Sioux Lookout 29 19 4 6 0 19 72% 13
St Anthony 86 48 4 34 0 14 85% 27
St Catharines 8 5 0 2 1 16 71% 4
St Hubert 25 9 3 13 0 13 84% 14
St John's 54 48 4 1 1 16 79% 26
Stephenville 28 25 2 1 0 21 68% 21
Sudbury 28 21 1 6 0 15 79% 8
Sydney 48 39 5 4 0 18 71% 20
Tasiujaq 4 4 0 0 0 4 100% 8
Thunder Bay 19 11 1 6 1 15 83% 10
Timmins 24 21 2 1 0 11 96% 10
Toronto City Centre 30 17 2 11 0 14 73% 18
Toronto LBPI 29 25 2 2 0 14 72% 23
Trois rivieres 23 14 1 8 0 19 74% 7
Val-d'Or 46 27 4 14 1 13 84% 11
Wabush 30 15 1 14 0 17 73% 11
Waskaganish 8 5 0 2 1 19 71% 4
Waterloo/Wellington 48 13 3 28 4 15 77% 11
Wawa 5 4 0 1 0 9 100% 6
Wiarton 20 12 2 5 1 19 74% 10
Windsor 29 21 4 4 0 13 83% 17
Yarmouth 34 29 2 3 0 12 85% 9
Canadian Meteorological Aviation Centre/West (Edmonton)
Station Number of observations not covered by current TAF Number responded to by an amended TAF Number responded to by next regular TAF Number where weather changed back to match TAF Number where weather and TAF remained inconsistent Average response time in minutes Percentage of TAF responses within 20 minutes Number of proactive amendments
Abbotsford 8 5 0 3 0 12 88% 5
Arctic Bay 7 5 1 0 1 13 83% 7
Arviat 49 26 4 19 0 17 71% 20
Baker Lake 30 25 3 2 0 12 90% 18
Bella Bella 28 16 0 11 1 16 78% 12
Brandon 18 17 0 1 0 7 100% 15
Buffalo Narrows 8 8 0 0 0 12 88% 5
Burwash 3 3 0 0 0 16 100% 1
Calgary Intl 9 9 0 0 0 9 100% 10
Cambridge Bay 21 20 1 0 0 13 81% 13
Campbell River 1 1 0 0 0 69 0% 3
Cape Dorset 51 28 4 19 0 21 75% 23
Castlegar 1 1 0 0 0 24 0% 2
Churchill 19 17 1 1 0 8 95% 7
Clyde River 45 23 0 22 0 15 78% 22
Coral Harbour 15 14 1 0 0 19 67% 20
Cranbrook 2 2 0 0 0 16 100% 1
Deline 2 2 0 0 0 4 100% 0
Dauphin 30 19 1 10 0 9 97% 11
Dawson City 3 2 0 1 0 10 100% 1
Dawson Creek 7 3 0 4 0 8 100% 4
Dease Lake 5 2 1 2 0 12 100% 3
Edmonton Intl 5 3 1 1 0 9 100% 11
Edmonton Villeneuve 26 9 2 14 1 16 72% 9
Estevan 14 14 0 0 0 8 93% 4
Eureka 6 6 0 0 0 4 100% 13
Faro 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 5
Fort Chipewyan 10 6 0 4 0 13 90% 3
Fort Good Hope 6 5 1 0 0 9 100% 3
Fort McMurray 38 23 1 14 0 13 82% 11
Fort McPherson 2 2 0 0 0 4 100% 1
Fort Nelson 14 12 0 2 0 11 86% 6
Fort Simpson 28 23 1 3 1 11 93% 12
Fort Smith 24 20 1 3 0 18 71% 8
Fort St John 9 7 2 0 0 25 56% 6
Gillam 5 5 0 0 0 21 60% 6
Gjoa Haven 81 36 10 27 8 24 62% 39
Grande Prairie 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 3
Hall Beach 40 20 3 14 3 19 78% 27
Hay River 30 23 2 5 0 13 90% 14
High Level 7 6 0 1 0 18 71% 9
Holman 3 1 1 0 1 20 50% 3
Igloolik 11 11 0 0 0 10 91% 10
Inuvik 10 8 0 2 0 11 90% 6
Iqaluit 40 33 2 5 0 15 80% 27
Island Lake 7 5 0 2 0 19 71% 7
Kamloops 2 2 0 0 0 7 100% 7
Kelowna 3 0 1 2 0 11 100% 2
Key Lake 28 10 2 15 1 17 74% 5
Kugaaruk 11 9 0 2 0 11 73% 9
Kugluktuk 8 6 0 1 1 11 86% 10
La Ronge 14 12 0 2 0 9 93% 4
Lethbridge 11 6 0 4 1 13 90% 19
Lloydminster 18 9 3 6 0 15 78% 8
Lutselk'e 3 2 0 1 0 21 67% 1
Lynn Lake 22 11 1 10 0 13 82% 4
Mackenzie 14 12 0 2 0 16 79% 6
Masset 18 12 1 2 3 20 87% 3
Mayo 1 1 0 0 0 6 100% 1
Medicine Hat 15 6 2 7 0 19 80% 7
Nanaimo 1 0 0 1 0 120 0% 2
Norman Wells 7 4 0 3 0 11 71% 8
North Battleford 14 10 0 4 0 10 86% 5
Norway House 13 7 1 5 0 7 100% 0
Old Crow 2 2 0 0 0 11 100% 6
Pangnirtung 10 9 0 1 0 10 100% 14
Paulatuk 4 4 0 0 0 12 100% 4
Peace River 8 6 1 1 0 14 75% 6
Penticton 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 4
Pond Inlet 31 16 3 12 0 13 84% 30
Port Hardy 12 11 1 0 0 18 75% 9
Prince Albert 18 14 0 4 0 17 83% 3
Prince George 15 9 1 5 0 14 80% 8
Qikiqtarjuaq 41 25 1 15 0 18 73% 24
Quesnel 15 6 0 9 0 7 93% 11
Rae Lake 5 3 0 1 1 23 50% 1
Rankin Inlet 37 26 6 4 1 18 72% 16
Red Deer 11 10 0 1 0 19 82% 7
Regina 21 20 1 0 0 11 95% 11
Repulse Bay 9 6 0 3 0 22 78% 7
Resolute Bay 20 12 3 5 0 11 80% 27
Sachs Harbour 3 3 0 0 0 2 100% 3
Sandspit 37 14 2 20 1 20 78% 13
Saskatoon 10 10 0 0 0 12 90% 6
Slave Lake 31 17 1 13 0 16 77% 14
Smithers 7 3 0 4 0 10 86% 7
Springbank 8 6 0 2 0 8 100% 6
Stony Rapids 19 7 1 10 1 9 89% 3
Swift Current 14 10 0 4 0 16 86% 4
Taloyoak 15 12 2 1 0 14 73% 13
Terrace 18 16 1 1 0 15 83% 6
Teslin 3 2 0 1 0 15 67% 0
The Pas 21 21 0 0 0 10 100% 2
Thompson 8 4 2 2 0 22 62% 1
Tofino 11 6 1 1 3 32 62% 2
Tuktoyaktuk 1 1 0 0 0 9 100% 2
Vancouver 3 3 0 0 0 12 100% 7
Victoria 2 1 1 0 0 16 100% 3
Victoria Harbour 0 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A 0
Watson Lake 6 6 0 0 0 10 100% 2
Wekweeti 8 5 0 3 0 19 75% 4
Whitecourt 3 3 0 0 0 13 67% 3
Whitehorse 4 4 0 0 0 16 75% 5
Williams Lake 12 10 1 1 0 17 83% 2
Winnipeg 24 18 3 3 0 11 92% 24
Yellowknife 12 11 0 1 0 14 83% 3
Note: tThe Scenario indicates the amendment criteria that is used in calculating the amendment response time.   The scenario “NC_CRITERIA” uses all the MANAIR (Standards Document) amendment criteria defined in section 2.9 Amended TAFs with the exception of the 2500/6 ceiling and visibility threshold (when actual conditions are better than forecast), Obscurations, and Wind.